Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update zerocracy/pages-action action to v0.0.30 #3305

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/workflows/zerocracy.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ jobs:
vitals_url=https://www.eolang.org/zerocracy/objectionary-vitals.html
repositories=objectionary/*
factbase: objectionary.fb
- uses: zerocracy/[email protected].29
- uses: zerocracy/[email protected].30
with:
factbase: objectionary.fb
output: pages

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code diff shows an update to the version of an external action being used in a GitHub Actions workflow. Specifically, zerocracy/pages-action has been updated from version 0.0.29 to 0.0.30. Here are some potential points of confusion or irregularity:

  1. Version Change: It's not inherently confusing or irregular, but one should be aware whenever versions of dependencies are changed. This change could introduce unexpected behavior if there are breaking changes or bugs in the new version (0.0.30).

  2. Reuse of factbase: factbase: objectionary.fb is specified two times. Once before the - uses: zerocracy/[email protected] and then within the with: section. If this is intentional (like setting up a default factbase and then overwriting it for a particular action), it's fine. However, it might cause confusion as to why it's placed there twice.

  3. Absence of Context: Without complete context, i.e., without knowing what other jobs or steps are part of this workflow, it's difficult to identify any wider-scale confusions or possible impacts.

In summary, this change seems straightforward and doesn't appear to have any obvious errors. Still, a full understanding would require knowledge of the specific capabilities of the version 0.0.30 of zerocracy/pages-action and the overall context of the workflow.

Expand Down
Loading