chore(ci): Run client + host workflow on 32 bit platform

[emhane]

Closes #849

[emhane]

seems like no runner wants to pick up this job...

Requested labels: linux-ubuntu-latest-32bit
Job defined at: op-rs/kona/.github/workflows/client_host.yaml@refs/pull/907/merge
Waiting for a runner to pick up this job...
Requested labels: linux-ubuntu-latest-32bit
Job defined at: op-rs/kona/.github/workflows/client_host.yaml@refs/pull/907/merge
Waiting for a runner to pick up this job...

[emhane]

not sure why the syntax isn't being parsed, feel free to take over

The workflow is not valid. .github/workflows/client_host.yaml (Line: 18, Col: 9): Unrecognized named-value: 'matrix'. Located at position 1 within expression: matrix.isa == '32'

[refcell]

It appears this won't work because github actions checkout steps require a node version only available in 64 bit builds.

[emhane]

ah ok, I was looking at this https://github.com/yuki-kimoto/SPVM-Regex/blob/master/.github/workflows/linux-ubuntu-latest-32bit.yml @refcell

[clabby]

It looks like @refcell's fix does the trick, but the image we're using does not have all of the tools that are preloaded into GitHub's runner-images. To complete this I think we'd need to add an extra step to install all required dependencies when running with the i386/ubuntu base.

[emhane]

ah I thought rustc was clever enough to infer the target in this case. is that what you mean? @clabby

[clabby]

ah I thought rustc was clever enough to infer the target in this case. is that what you mean? @clabby

Ah nope - this isn't to do with rustc, the image that the actual runner is executing the job on doesn't have the tools that are required. GitHub's runner images come pre-loaded with a bunch of stuff (gnu utils, docker, nodejs, etc.) that this new i386 image doesn't have.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.2%. Comparing base (8e25874) to head (1fecb59).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.