Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8349509: [macos] Clean up macOS dead code in jpackage #23504

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sashamatveev
Copy link
Member

@sashamatveev sashamatveev commented Feb 6, 2025

  • Removed unused INSTALLER_SUFFIX bundler param.
  • Removed unreachable if branch in MacAppImageBuilder.

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8349509: [macos] Clean up macOS dead code in jpackage (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23504/head:pull/23504
$ git checkout pull/23504

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23504
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23504/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23504

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23504

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23504.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 6, 2025

👋 Welcome back almatvee! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2025

@sashamatveev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8349509: [macos] Clean up macOS dead code in jpackage

Reviewed-by: asemenyuk

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • a0c7f66: 8349508: runtime/cds/appcds/TestParallelGCWithCDS.java should not check for specific output

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2025

@sashamatveev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 6, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 6, 2025
@sashamatveev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Going to push as commit f0ea38b.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7f6c687: 8349374: [JVMCI] concurrent use of HotSpotSpeculationLog can crash
  • bd9b24c: 8349512: Duplicate PermittedSubclasses entries with doclint enabled
  • b40f8ee: 8337251: C1: Improve Class.isInstance intrinsic
  • 88a8483: 8349121: SSLParameters.setApplicationProtocols() ALPN example could be clarified
  • fb847bb: 8349493: Replace sun.util.locale.ParseStatus usage with java.text.ParsePosition
  • 7cd5cb2: 8349532: Refactor ./util/Pem/encoding.sh to run in java
  • 86cec4e: 8343782: G1: Use one G1CardSet instance for multiple old gen regions
  • 006ed5c: 8349375: Cleanup AIX special file build settings
  • 3989a19: 8344925: translet-name ignored when package-name is also set
  • 1eb54e4: 8346049: jdk/test/lib/security/timestamp/TsaServer.java warnings
  • ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/10791477cf0a0a31d2703fc718a7a649d494d534...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 7, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 7, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 7, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 7, 2025

@sashamatveev Pushed as commit f0ea38b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants