test(calendar-view): Add calendar-view e2e UI test

[Youyou-smiles]

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced automated UI tests for the calendar component to ensure visual consistency and functionality.
  • Added tests for hover effects and the ability to set working days and holidays, enhancing user experience validation.

• Tests

  • Implemented two main test cases capturing screenshots to verify the calendar's appearance and interactive features.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new file tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts, which implements automated UI tests for the calendar component using Playwright. It includes two primary test cases that verify the visual appearance and functionality of the calendar component in various scenarios, including capturing screenshots during interactions.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts	Introduced automated UI tests for the calendar component, including two test cases for visual validation and functionality.

Possibly related PRs

• test(pager): add pager UI E2E test case #29: Enhances the screenshot testing configuration relevant to the automated UI tests for the calendar component.
• test(notify): add notify UI e2e test #30: Introduces UI tests using Playwright for the notify component, sharing a similar testing framework.
• test(form): add form UI E2E test case #32: Implements form UI tests with Playwright for visual regression testing, aligning with the calendar component tests.
• test(link): add link E2E UI test case #35: Adds UI tests for the link component using Playwright, consistent with the testing strategy of the main PR.
• test(e2e): add checkbox e2e UI test #36: Introduces checkbox UI tests utilizing Playwright for visual testing, paralleling the main PR's focus on automated UI testing.
• test: add steps UI e2e test #43: Implements UI tests for the steps component with a similar testing framework as the main PR.
• test: add milestone UI e2e test #44: Introduces milestone UI tests using Playwright, aligning with the testing methodology of the main PR.
• test(badge): add badge UI e2e test #45: Adds UI tests for the badge component, employing the same testing framework as the main PR.
• test: add tabs UI e2e test #46: Introduces tabs UI tests using Playwright, similar to the main PR's approach to testing.
• test: add time-line UI e2e test #47: Adds UI tests for the timeline component, aligning with the automated testing strategy of the main PR.
• test: add filter-panel UI e2e test #49: Introduces filter-panel UI tests utilizing Playwright, indicating a shared testing framework.
• test: add file-upload UI e2e test #52: Implements UI tests for the file-upload component, relevant as it employs the same testing framework.
• test(carousel): add ui-test #54: Introduces carousel UI tests using Playwright, aligning with the main PR's testing approach.
• test: add progress UI e2e test #57: Adds UI tests for the progress component, relevant as it employs the same testing framework.
• test(button-group): add button-group e2e UI test #60: Introduces button-group UI tests using Playwright, indicating a shared methodology with the main PR.
• test(time-select;drop-times): add e2e UI test #63: Implements UI tests for the time-select and drop-times components, aligning with the automated testing strategy.

Suggested labels

e2e

Suggested reviewers

• zzcr

🐰 In the garden, we hop and play,
Testing the calendar, come what may!
With every click and hover we see,
A perfect view for you and me!
Screenshots captured, all in line,
Our UI shines, oh how divine! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)

tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts (4)

3-3: Consider using English for test descriptions.

While the current description 'calendar 组件xdesign规范' is valid, using English for test descriptions can improve international collaboration and maintainability. Consider translating it to something like "Calendar component xdesign specifications".

---

4-17: LGTM: Well-structured UI test with appropriate assertions.

The test case effectively checks the calendar view's UI, including default and hover states. The error handling and screenshot comparisons are well-implemented.

Consider translating the test description to English for consistency, e.g., "calendar-view--UI screenshot".

---

19-42: LGTM: Comprehensive test for setting working days and holidays.

The test case effectively checks the functionality of setting working days, rest days, and holidays in the calendar view. The interactions and screenshot comparisons are well-implemented.

Suggestions for improvement:

1. Consider translating the test description to English for consistency, e.g., "Set working days or holidays--UI screenshot".
2. The screenshot name 'right-hover.png' (line 41) doesn't seem to accurately describe the state being captured. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive, like 'after-setting-days.png'.

---

1-43: Overall: Well-structured and comprehensive e2e tests for the calendar component.

The tests effectively cover both UI appearance and functional interactions of the calendar component. The use of screenshots for visual regression testing is a good practice.

Suggestions for further improvement:

1. Consider adding more edge cases, such as testing with different months or years.
2. It might be beneficial to test keyboard navigation within the calendar component.
3. Consider adding tests for any accessibility features the calendar component might have.

Great job on implementing these e2e tests! They will significantly contribute to maintaining the quality of the calendar component.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a5f84e and f45d4e7.

🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (4)

• tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/basic-usage-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/line-hover-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/right-hover-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/set-working-day-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)

tests/calendar-view/xdesign.spec.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM: Imports are correct and concise.

The necessary Playwright test utilities are imported correctly.