Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: redirect to req/create when on /req #642

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

kushagrasarathe
Copy link
Collaborator

@kushagrasarathe kushagrasarathe commented Jan 22, 2025

  • fix req route redirect
    fixes TASK-8267

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new route handler for redirecting users to the request creation page when accessing the request route.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
peanut-ui ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 22, 2025 7:20pm

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GET route handler has been added to the application's routing system. When a GET request is made to this specific route, users will be automatically redirected to the /request/create page using Next.js's redirect method. This change appears to be a simple routing mechanism to guide users to a request creation page.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/app/request/route.ts Added a new GET function that uses next/navigation's redirect to send users to /request/create

Poem

🐰 A hop, a skip, a routing delight,
Redirecting users with all my might!
From request path to create we'll go,
A simple journey, smooth and flow
Rabbit's routing magic takes flight! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79ab88d and 20aa62c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/request/route.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/request/route.ts (2)

1-1: LGTM! Correct import for Next.js navigation.

The import statement follows Next.js best practices by using the official navigation package.


3-5: Verify the correct redirect path and consider adding error handling.

The implementation looks good, but there are two considerations:

  1. There's a discrepancy between the PR description (mentioning "/req/create") and the actual redirect path ("/request/create"). Please verify which path is correct.

  2. Consider adding error handling as a good practice:

 export function GET() {
+    try {
         redirect('/request/create')
+    } catch (error) {
+        console.error('Redirect failed:', error)
+        // Fallback redirect or error handling
+        redirect('/')
+    }
 }

Let's verify the correct path configuration:

✅ Verification successful

The implemented redirect path '/request/create' is correct

The codebase consistently uses '/request/create' across multiple components and route handlers. The PR description mentioning "/req/create" appears to be incorrect and should be updated to match the actual implementation.

Evidence:

  • Route handler in src/app/request/route.ts uses '/request/create'
  • Navigation components in Canceled.view.tsx and Error.view.tsx use the same path
  • No instances of '/req/create' found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for route configurations and usages
echo "Searching for related route configurations..."
rg -l 'req/create|request/create' --type ts --type tsx

echo "\nChecking for Next.js route files..."
fd -e ts -e tsx route.ts route.tsx

echo "\nChecking for navigation usage..."
rg "redirect\(['\"]/(req|request)" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 571


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for route files
echo "Finding route handler files..."
fd route.ts

echo -e "\nSearching for redirect patterns..."
rg -A 2 "redirect.*['\"]/(req|request)" 

echo -e "\nChecking for navigation components..."
rg -A 2 "(href|push|replace).*['\"]/(req|request)"

Length of output: 3151

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kushagrasarathe kushagrasarathe merged commit 9dcc067 into develop Jan 22, 2025
4 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant