-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
br: use atomic.Pointer instead of atomic.Value #49359
Conversation
Hi @yoshikipom. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @yoshikipom. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #49359 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 71.0517% 72.8938% +1.8421%
================================================
Files 1368 1415 +47
Lines 401578 416972 +15394
================================================
+ Hits 285328 303947 +18619
+ Misses 96418 93862 -2556
+ Partials 19832 19163 -669
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution, and please check CI link to update the test cases
/test pull-lightning-integration-test |
@lance6716: The specified target(s) for
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
don't worry, ci seems failed by other problems. I'll check it tomorrow |
@lance6716 Thank you for your support! |
Hi @yoshikipom please merge master branch, integration tests should be okay now |
/test pull-lightning-integration-test |
@lance6716: The specified target(s) for
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: 3pointer, lance6716 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #44736
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.