cherry-pick-7.5: br: restore checksum shouldn't rely on backup checksum (#56712)

[Tristan1900]

close #56373

(cherry picked from commit 4f047be)

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

The default behavior of doing checksum during full backup has changed from enabled to disabled.
The meaning of checksum flag is kind of ambiguous here, it doesn't mean we don't do the checksum of files when doing backup, instead we don't do checksum to compare from coprocessor side to the br side to improve the performance

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

The default behavior of doing checksum during full backup has changed from enabled to disabled. 
The meaning of checksum flag is kind of ambiguous here, it doesn't mean we don't do the checksum of files when doing backup, instead we don't do checksum to compare from coprocessor side to the br side to improve the performance

[tiprow]

Hi @Tristan1900. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 23.52941% with 39 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release-7.5@085de3a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-7.5     #58225   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   72.5035%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1417           
  Lines                  ?     416101           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     301688           
  Misses                 ?      94496           
  Partials               ?      19917           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	72.5035% <23.5294%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.9400% <0.0000%> (?)
parser	∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br	53.5758% <0.0000%> (?)

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BornChanger, YuJuncen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [YuJuncen]
• br/OWNERS [BornChanger,YuJuncen]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-12-13 03:38:23.103965916 +0000 UTC m=+582493.192768459: ☑️ agreed by YuJuncen.
• 2025-01-20 16:48:34.096611593 +0000 UTC m=+113041.427530994: ☑️ agreed by BornChanger.