Add Whac-A-Mole reference

_posts/2023-12-11-serializing-restaurant-tables-in-haskell.html

@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ <h3 id="ddac03fba5134f0da9e613c29888ce83">
         language pragma and then tell the compiler to automatically derive <code>Generic</code> for the DTO in question. You'll see an example of that shortly.
     </p>
     <p>
-        It's a fairly flexible system that you can tweak in various ways, but if it's possible to do it directly with the above <code>Table</code> type, please leave a comment explaining how. I tried, but couldn't make it work. To be clear, I <em>could</em> make it serializable, but not to the above JSON format.
+        It's a fairly flexible system that you can tweak in various ways, but if it's possible to do it directly with the above <code>Table</code> type, please leave a comment explaining how. I tried, but couldn't make it work. To be clear, I <em>could</em> make it serializable, but not to the above JSON format. <ins datetime="2023-12-11T11:06Z">After enough <a href="/2023/10/02/dependency-whac-a-mole">Aeson Whac-A-Mole</a> I decided to change tactics.</ins>
     </p>
     <p>
         In <a href="/2021/06/14/new-book-code-that-fits-in-your-head">Code That Fits in Your Head</a> I explain how you're usually better off separating the role of serialization from the role of Domain Model. The way to do that is exactly by defining a DTO for serialisation, and let the Domain Model remain exclusively to model the rules of the application. The above <code>Table</code> type plays the latter role, so we need new DTO types.