Remove rpcs #220
Remove rpcs #220
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve the handling of environment variables for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant PacketDetails
participant FeeAPI
User->>PacketDetails: Request funding information
PacketDetails->>FeeAPI: Fetch fee data (chainId)
FeeAPI-->>PacketDetails: Return fee data
PacketDetails-->>User: Display funding information
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| let optimismRPC = process.env.OPTIMISM_RPC!; | ||
| let baseRPC = process.env.BASE_RPC!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential risk of runtime errors due to non-null assertions.
The use of the non-null assertion operator (!) for optimismRPC and baseRPC assumes that these environment variables are always set. This change removes the previous safety net of fallback URLs and could lead to runtime errors if the environment variables are not set.
Consider adding error handling or documentation to ensure that these variables are set before deployment.
Consider adding runtime checks or fallback mechanisms.
The direct use of optimismRPC and baseRPC in the CHAIN_CONFIGS object without any checks could lead to failures if these environment variables are not set. This could compromise the application's robustness and lead to service disruptions.
Consider implementing runtime checks or fallback mechanisms within the CHAIN_CONFIGS object to handle cases where these variables might not be set.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/(routes)/packets/packet-details.tsx (3 hunks)
- app/api/packets/fee-data/route.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
app/(routes)/packets/packet-details.tsx
[error] 190-190: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
Additional comments not posted (6)
app/api/packets/fee-data/route.ts (5)
5-5: Clarify the use of thedynamicconstant.The constant
dynamicis set to 'force-dynamic'. Please clarify its intended use, as it's not immediately clear from the context.
7-13: Good error handling forchainId.The extraction and validation of
chainIdfrom the request URL are handled correctly, with appropriate error responses for invalid inputs.
15-23: Efficient loop for finding RPC URL.The loop efficiently finds the RPC URL corresponding to the provided
chainIdand breaks immediately after finding a match, which is good for performance.
25-27: Appropriate error handling for missing RPC URL.The function correctly handles the scenario where no RPC URL is found for the given
chainId, returning a 404 error with a clear message.
29-32: Correct use of ethers library for fetching fee data.The use of
ethers.JsonRpcProviderto connect to the blockchain and fetch fee data is implemented correctly, with proper handling of asynchronous operations.app/(routes)/packets/packet-details.tsx (1)
30-31: Verify the correctness of the chain ID usage.The changes to use chain IDs instead of RPC URLs in the
calcTxFundingfunction calls are aligned with the PR's objective to remove RPCs. Ensure that the chain IDs are correctly retrieved and used throughout the application.Run the following script to verify the chain ID usage:
Verification successful
Chain ID Usage Verified
The usage of
chainIdinapp/(routes)/packets/packet-details.tsxis consistent with the PR's objective to replace RPC URLs with chain IDs. ThechainIdis correctly utilized in thecalcTxFundingfunction and API requests, confirming the correctness of the changes. No issues were found with the implementation.
app/(routes)/packets/packet-details.tsx: Correct usage ofchainIdincalcTxFundingand API calls.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the chain ID usage in the application. # Test: Search for the chain ID usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new chain ID usage. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'chainId'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the chain ID usage in the application. # Test: Search for the chain ID usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new chain ID usage. rg --type ts -A 5 'chainId'Length of output: 30723
| async function calcTxFunding(chainId: Number, feesDeposited?: number, gasLimit?: number) { | ||
| if (!feesDeposited || !gasLimit) { | ||
| return 0; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(chainRpc) | ||
| const feeData = await provider.getFeeData(); | ||
| const feeResponse = await fetch(`/api/packets/fee-data?chainId=${chainId}`, { cache: 'no-store' }); | ||
| const feeData = await feeResponse.json(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the type issue and approve the changes.
The function calcTxFunding has been updated to use a chain ID and fetch fee data from an API, aligning with the PR's objectives. However, the type 'Number' should be corrected to 'number' for consistency with TypeScript best practices.
Apply this diff to correct the type issue:
-async function calcTxFunding(chainId: Number, feesDeposited?: number, gasLimit?: number) {
+async function calcTxFunding(chainId: number, feesDeposited?: number, gasLimit?: number) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async function calcTxFunding(chainId: Number, feesDeposited?: number, gasLimit?: number) { | |
| if (!feesDeposited || !gasLimit) { | |
| return 0; | |
| } | |
| const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(chainRpc) | |
| const feeData = await provider.getFeeData(); | |
| const feeResponse = await fetch(`/api/packets/fee-data?chainId=${chainId}`, { cache: 'no-store' }); | |
| const feeData = await feeResponse.json(); | |
| async function calcTxFunding(chainId: number, feesDeposited?: number, gasLimit?: number) { | |
| if (!feesDeposited || !gasLimit) { | |
| return 0; | |
| } | |
| const feeResponse = await fetch(`/api/packets/fee-data?chainId=${chainId}`, { cache: 'no-store' }); | |
| const feeData = await feeResponse.json(); |
Tools
Biome
[error] 190-190: Don't use 'Number' as a type.
Use lowercase primitives for consistency.
Safe fix: Use 'number' instead(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/(routes)/packets/packet-details.tsx (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/(routes)/packets/packet-details.tsx
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
optimismRPCandbaseRPC, eliminating fallback URLs.Bug Fixes
Performance Improvements
PacketDetailscomponent, improving performance by reducing unnecessary API calls and dependencies.