-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Bob and Mode chains #277
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the blockchain configuration capabilities of the application by adding support for two new chains, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/utils/chains/configs.ts (1)
Line range hint
57-63
: Consider improving chain name matching logicThe current string matching in
clientToDisplay
could lead to false matches if one chain name is a substring of another. Consider using exact matching or a more robust approach.export function clientToDisplay(client: string) { for (const key in CHAIN_CONFIGS) { - if (client.toLowerCase().includes(key.toLowerCase())) { + const chainKey = key.toLowerCase(); + const clientLower = client.toLowerCase(); + // Match exact chain name or chain name with common suffixes + if (clientLower === chainKey || clientLower === `${chainKey}-chain` || clientLower === `${chainKey}-client`) { return CHAIN_CONFIGS[key as CHAIN].display; } } }app/utils/chains/icons.tsx (1)
37-61
: LGTM with suggestions: Consider improving BobIcon readabilityThe implementation is correct and follows the established pattern. Consider these optional improvements:
- Add descriptive comments for each SVG path to explain what they represent
- Break long path data strings into multiple lines for better readability
Example improvement:
export const BobIcon = (size?: number): JSX.Element => { return ( <svg width={size || 32} height={size || 32} viewBox="0 0 513 513" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> + {/* Circle background */} <path d="M256.954 512.454C398.339 512.454 512.954 397.839 512.954 256.454C512.954 115.069 398.339 0.453613 256.954 0.453613C115.569 0.453613 0.953613 115.069 0.953613 256.454C0.953613 397.839 115.569 512.454 256.954 512.454Z" fill="#F25D00" /> + {/* Top-left square */} <path d="M160.763 203.097V281.151C160.763 283.837 162.94 286.015 165.627 286.015H243.681C246.367 286.015 248.545 283.837 248.545 281.151V203.097C248.545 200.41 246.367 198.233 243.681 198.233H165.627C162.94 198.233 160.763 200.41 160.763 203.097Z" fill="white" /> // Add similar comments for other paths
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/utils/chains/configs.ts
(2 hunks)app/utils/chains/icons.tsx
(2 hunks)app/utils/chains/id-maps.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
app/utils/chains/id-maps.ts (4)
20-20
: LGTM: Type definition properly extended
The ChainName type has been correctly expanded to include the new chains while maintaining type safety.
32-34
: LGTM: Testnet chain IDs are correct
The Sepolia testnet chain IDs are correctly configured:
- Mode Sepolia: 919
- Bob Sepolia: 808813
Let's verify there are no conflicting testnet chain ID definitions:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any conflicting testnet chain ID definitions
# Expect: No conflicting values for 919 or 808813
echo "Checking for Mode Sepolia chain ID (919) usage:"
rg -n "919" --type ts
echo "Checking for Bob Sepolia chain ID (808813) usage:"
rg -n "808813" --type ts
20-34
: Verify environment configuration for new chains
While the chain IDs are correctly configured, ensure that the corresponding environment variables are properly set up for both chains in the deployment configuration.
Let's check for environment variable definitions:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify environment variable configuration for Mode and Bob chains
# Expect: Environment variable definitions in configuration files
echo "Checking for Mode-related environment variables:"
rg -n "MODE_.*_RPC|MODE_.*_API" --type ts
echo "Checking for Bob-related environment variables:"
rg -n "BOB_.*_RPC|BOB_.*_API" --type ts
23-27
: LGTM: Chain IDs are correct
The mainnet chain IDs are correctly configured:
- Mode Mainnet: 34443
- Bob Mainnet: 60808
Let's verify there are no conflicting chain ID definitions elsewhere in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Chain IDs are correctly defined and consistent across the codebase
The verification confirms that:
- Mode chain ID (34443) and Bob chain ID (60808) are only defined once in
mainnetIdMap
- Both chains are properly typed in
ChainName
andCHAIN
types - The chains also have corresponding testnet IDs (Mode: 919, Bob: 808813) in
sepoliaIdMap
- No conflicting chain ID definitions were found elsewhere in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any conflicting chain ID definitions
# Expect: No conflicting values for 34443 or 60808
echo "Checking for Mode chain ID (34443) usage:"
rg -n "34443" --type ts
echo "Checking for Bob chain ID (60808) usage:"
rg -n "60808" --type ts
Length of output: 297
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for chain IDs and chain references
# Search for Mode chain references
echo "Searching for Mode chain references:"
rg -n "mode.*chain|chain.*mode" --type ts -i
# Search for Bob chain references
echo "Searching for Bob chain references:"
rg -n "bob.*chain|chain.*bob" --type ts -i
# Search for chain ID definitions or mappings
echo "Searching for chain ID mapping patterns:"
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = {
$$$
mode: $_,
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = {
$$$
bob: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 831
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any numeric values in the chain configuration files
echo "Checking chain ID definitions in config files:"
rg -n "[0-9]+" app/utils/chains/configs.ts app/utils/chains/id-maps.ts -A 2 -B 2
# Also search for any chain-related type definitions and interfaces
echo "Checking chain-related type definitions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = {
$$$
chainId: $_,
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
chainId: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2166
app/utils/chains/configs.ts (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Type and import changes are consistent
The CHAIN type extension and new icon imports align well with the PR objective of adding Mode and Bob chains.
Also applies to: 4-4
40-55
: Verify block times for Mode and Bob chains
The block time is set to 2 seconds for both Mode and Bob chains, matching other chains. Please verify if this is accurate for these specific networks.
app/utils/chains/icons.tsx (3)
6-11
: LGTM: Formatting improvements in OptimismIcon
The formatting changes improve code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
21-24
: LGTM: Consistent formatting in BaseIcon
The formatting changes maintain consistency with the project's style.
26-35
: LGTM: Well-structured ModeIcon implementation
The implementation follows the established pattern and maintains good visual hierarchy with appropriate contrast between the yellow background and black text.
let modeDispatcher = process.env.DISPATCHER_ADDRESS_MODE!; | ||
let bobDispatcher = process.env.DISPATCHER_ADDRESS_BOB!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding runtime validation for environment variables
The non-null assertions (!) could lead to runtime errors if environment variables are not properly set. Consider adding validation with meaningful error messages.
Here's a suggested implementation:
-let modeDispatcher = process.env.DISPATCHER_ADDRESS_MODE!;
-let bobDispatcher = process.env.DISPATCHER_ADDRESS_BOB!;
-let modeClientName = process.env.MODE_CLIENT_NAME!;
-let bobClientName = process.env.BOB_CLIENT_NAME!;
-let modeRPC = process.env.MODE_RPC!;
-let bobRPC = process.env.BOB_RPC!;
+const getEnvVar = (name: string): string => {
+ const value = process.env[name];
+ if (!value) {
+ throw new Error(`Missing required environment variable: ${name}`);
+ }
+ return value;
+};
+
+let modeDispatcher = getEnvVar('DISPATCHER_ADDRESS_MODE');
+let bobDispatcher = getEnvVar('DISPATCHER_ADDRESS_BOB');
+let modeClientName = getEnvVar('MODE_CLIENT_NAME');
+let bobClientName = getEnvVar('BOB_CLIENT_NAME');
+let modeRPC = getEnvVar('MODE_RPC');
+let bobRPC = getEnvVar('BOB_RPC');
Also applies to: 13-14, 18-19
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation