Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated packets api call to use evm-indexer #96

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mvpoyatt
Copy link
Collaborator

@mvpoyatt mvpoyatt commented Apr 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added functionality to fetch recent packets.
  • Enhancements
    • Improved packet retrieval based on transaction hash.
  • API Changes
    • Updated packet processing to enhance data handling and response format.
  • Refactor
    • Refactored getPackets function for concurrency control and improved logic for fetching packets.
    • Added stringToState and processPacketRequest functions for better data processing.
    • Modified getPacket function signature for improved functionality.
    • Removed SimpleCache import and cache variable for optimization.
  • API Routing
    • Updated import paths for getChannel, getChannels, and logger.
    • Modified GET function in packet routes to handle different scenarios effectively.

@mvpoyatt mvpoyatt requested review from Inkvi and dshiell April 19, 2024 21:41
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance packet management efficiency and logic across files, with optimizations like function renaming, concurrency control for packet retrieval, and improved processing for quicker responses.

Changes

File Path Changes
.../channels/helpers.ts - Renamed stateToString to stringToState
- Updated state mapping logic
- Adjusted getChannelByGQQuery to accommodate changes
.../channels/route.ts - Updated import paths for channel operations and dependencies
.../ibc/[type]/route.ts - Removed unnecessary SimpleCache import and related logic
.../packets/helpers.ts - Refactored getPackets with concurrency control
- Added new packet processing functions
- Modified getPacket function signature
.../packets/route.ts - Enhanced GET function to handle different scenarios effectively

Possibly related issues

  • Issue Revisit packets API logic #32: Revisiting packets API logic aligns with the changes made to getPackets and packet processing functions, aiming for improved performance and efficient data retrieval.

Poem

🐇✨📜
In the code's winding maze, changes take flight,
Packet streams optimized, code now alight.
With concurrency's dance and logic's embrace,
The system evolves, a faster pace.
Data flows smoother, in packets' ballet,
A digital symphony, in the coding array.


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 92c7252 and 1df7898.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • app/api/channels/helpers.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/api/channels/route.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/api/ibc/[type]/route.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/api/packets/helpers.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/api/packets/route.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • app/api/channels/helpers.ts
  • app/api/channels/route.ts
  • app/api/ibc/[type]/route.ts
  • app/api/packets/route.ts
Additional comments not posted (4)
app/api/packets/helpers.ts (4)

4-12: The renaming and logic update in stringToState function are correctly implemented.


16-89: Consider enhancing the error logging in processPacketRequest to include more context about the error, such as the error message or stack trace.


138-182: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [97-142]

The modifications in getPacket function are correctly implemented, ensuring it returns a promise and correctly constructs the GraphQL query.


144-181: The getRecentPackets function is correctly implemented, with appropriate GraphQL query construction and promise handling.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Comment on lines 28 to 34
let packets: Packet[] = [];
for (let packet of unprocessedPackets) {
try {
packets.push(await processPacket(packet));
} catch (err) {
console.log(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure proper error handling in the loop where packets are processed. Consider breaking out of the loop or marking individual packet failures without stopping the processing of other packets.

-    } catch (err) {
-      console.log(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err);
-    }
+    } catch (err) {
+      console.error(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err);
+      // Optionally, add error handling logic here, such as continuing with the next packet.
+    }

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
let packets: Packet[] = [];
for (let packet of unprocessedPackets) {
try {
packets.push(await processPacket(packet));
} catch (err) {
console.log(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err);
}
let packets: Packet[] = [];
for (let packet of unprocessedPackets) {
try {
packets.push(await processPacket(packet));
} catch (err) {
console.error(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err);
// Optionally, add error handling logic here, such as continuing with the next packet.
}

}

return NextResponse.json(packets);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Returning the processed packets as a JSON response is consistent with the API's design. However, there is no explicit documentation found in the README.md or as comments in the code regarding the usage and expectations of NextResponse.json. It is recommended to add detailed documentation to ensure clarity and consistency in how JSON responses are handled and expected by clients.

  • Add documentation in the README.md or in relevant sections of the codebase about the usage and structure of JSON responses using NextResponse.json.
Analysis chain

Returning the processed packets as a JSON response is consistent with the API's design. Ensure that the response format meets the client's expectations.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the JSON response format is correctly documented and matches client expectations.
cat README.md | grep "NextResponse.json"

Length of output: 40



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search the entire codebase for any documentation or comments regarding NextResponse.json
rg "NextResponse.json" -C 3

Length of output: 2264

@@ -261,9 +260,8 @@ export async function getPackets() {
return response;
}

export async function getPacket(txHash: string) {
export async function getPacket(txHash: string): Promise<[] | [any]> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does return type has to use any ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It considers an empty array and an array of type empty two different types

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why can't you use Packet[]?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not actually a Packet yet once this function is done. It's the items array from the graphql response (which could be empty). It's the processPacket function that takes that raw data and returns actual Packets

return (packetRes?.data?.packets?.items || []);
}

export async function getRecentPackets(): Promise<[] | [any]> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does return type has to use any ?

Comment on lines 363 to 364
const packetRes = await (await fetch(process.env.INDEXER_URL!, packetOptions)).json();
return (packetRes?.data?.packets?.items || []);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Take a look how channels api is implemented for inspiration how getRecentPackets and getPacket can be refactored to reuse shared functionality.

@mvpoyatt mvpoyatt force-pushed the mp/indexer-packets branch from eb03709 to 1df7898 Compare April 22, 2024 18:59
@mvpoyatt mvpoyatt merged commit cd83e34 into main Apr 22, 2024
1 check passed
@mvpoyatt mvpoyatt deleted the mp/indexer-packets branch April 22, 2024 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants