-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated packets api call to use evm-indexer #96
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance packet management efficiency and logic across files, with optimizations like function renaming, concurrency control for packet retrieval, and improved processing for quicker responses. Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (5)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
Additional comments not posted (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
app/api/packets/route.ts
Outdated
let packets: Packet[] = []; | ||
for (let packet of unprocessedPackets) { | ||
try { | ||
packets.push(await processPacket(packet)); | ||
} catch (err) { | ||
console.log(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure proper error handling in the loop where packets are processed. Consider breaking out of the loop or marking individual packet failures without stopping the processing of other packets.
- } catch (err) {
- console.log(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err);
- }
+ } catch (err) {
+ console.error(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err);
+ // Optionally, add error handling logic here, such as continuing with the next packet.
+ }
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
let packets: Packet[] = []; | |
for (let packet of unprocessedPackets) { | |
try { | |
packets.push(await processPacket(packet)); | |
} catch (err) { | |
console.log(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err); | |
} | |
let packets: Packet[] = []; | |
for (let packet of unprocessedPackets) { | |
try { | |
packets.push(await processPacket(packet)); | |
} catch (err) { | |
console.error(`Error processing packet ${packet.id}: ` + err); | |
// Optionally, add error handling logic here, such as continuing with the next packet. | |
} |
app/api/packets/route.ts
Outdated
} | ||
|
||
return NextResponse.json(packets); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Returning the processed packets as a JSON response is consistent with the API's design. However, there is no explicit documentation found in the README.md or as comments in the code regarding the usage and expectations of NextResponse.json
. It is recommended to add detailed documentation to ensure clarity and consistency in how JSON responses are handled and expected by clients.
- Add documentation in the README.md or in relevant sections of the codebase about the usage and structure of JSON responses using
NextResponse.json
.
Analysis chain
Returning the processed packets as a JSON response is consistent with the API's design. Ensure that the response format meets the client's expectations.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the JSON response format is correctly documented and matches client expectations.
cat README.md | grep "NextResponse.json"
Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search the entire codebase for any documentation or comments regarding NextResponse.json
rg "NextResponse.json" -C 3
Length of output: 2264
app/api/packets/helpers.ts
Outdated
@@ -261,9 +260,8 @@ export async function getPackets() { | |||
return response; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
export async function getPacket(txHash: string) { | |||
export async function getPacket(txHash: string): Promise<[] | [any]> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does return type has to use any
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It considers an empty array and an array of type empty two different types
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why can't you use Packet[]
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not actually a Packet
yet once this function is done. It's the items
array from the graphql response (which could be empty). It's the processPacket
function that takes that raw data and returns actual Packet
s
app/api/packets/helpers.ts
Outdated
return (packetRes?.data?.packets?.items || []); | ||
} | ||
|
||
export async function getRecentPackets(): Promise<[] | [any]> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does return type has to use any
?
app/api/packets/helpers.ts
Outdated
const packetRes = await (await fetch(process.env.INDEXER_URL!, packetOptions)).json(); | ||
return (packetRes?.data?.packets?.items || []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Take a look how channels api is implemented for inspiration how getRecentPackets
and getPacket
can be refactored to reuse shared functionality.
eb03709
to
1df7898
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
getPackets
function for concurrency control and improved logic for fetching packets.stringToState
andprocessPacketRequest
functions for better data processing.getPacket
function signature for improved functionality.SimpleCache
import andcache
variable for optimization.getChannel
,getChannels
, andlogger
.GET
function in packet routes to handle different scenarios effectively.