Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix some function names in comment #5986

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

piguagua
Copy link

@piguagua piguagua commented Jan 15, 2025

Proposed changes

fix some function names in comment

Checklist

  • Pull request is created against the dev branch
  • All checks passed (lint, unit/integration/regression tests etc.) with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated function names and comments for improved clarity and consistency in the codebase
    • Renamed GetSupportedTemplateFileExtensions to GetSupportTemplateFileExtensions
    • Renamed isTemplate to IsTemplate
    • Updated method name from executeTemplateWithTarget to executeTemplateWithTargets

@auto-assign auto-assign bot requested a review from dwisiswant0 January 15, 2025 07:09
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves minor naming and comment updates across two files in the project. In pkg/catalog/config/template.go, function names have been modified to improve naming consistency, changing GetSupportedTemplateFileExtensions to GetSupportTemplateFileExtensions and isTemplate to IsTemplate. Similarly, in pkg/core/executors.go, the method executeTemplateWithTarget has been renamed to executeTemplateWithTargets, shifting from singular to plural terminology.

Changes

File Change Summary
pkg/catalog/config/template.go - Renamed GetSupportedTemplateFileExtensions() to GetSupportTemplateFileExtensions()
- Renamed isTemplate() to IsTemplate()
- Updated accompanying comments
pkg/core/executors.go - Renamed executeTemplateWithTarget() to executeTemplateWithTargets()

Suggested Reviewers

  • ehsandeep

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Renaming Rhyme 🐰

Functions dance with brand new names,
Plurals hop and camelCase claims,
Clarity springs like morning dew,
Code evolves, both clean and true!
Naming magic, soft and bright ✨

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/catalog/config/template.go (1)

Line range hint 45-51: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment.

The change from isTemplate to IsTemplate is appropriate as it follows Go's naming convention for exported functions, which is necessary since it's used as a callback for the goflags package.

Consider making the comment more descriptive:

-// IsTemplate is a callback function used by goflags to decide if given file should be read
-// if it is not a nuclei-template file only then file is read
+// IsTemplate is a callback function used by goflags to determine if a file is a valid
+// nuclei template. It returns false for known config files and true for files with
+// supported template extensions.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4a0b8e and 33e8960.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pkg/catalog/config/template.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/core/executors.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • pkg/core/executors.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pkg/catalog/config/template.go (1)

Line range hint 40-51: Verify all references are updated.

Since both functions are exported and their names were changed, we should verify that all references have been updated accordingly.

Let's check for any missed references:

✅ Verification successful

All references are properly updated

The verification confirms that all code references are using the new function names GetSupportTemplateFileExtensions and IsTemplate correctly, with no lingering references to the old names found in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old function names
echo "Checking for old function name references..."
rg "GetSupportedTemplateFileExtensions|isTemplate" --type go

# Search for potential documentation that might need updates
echo "Checking documentation files..."
rg "GetSupportedTemplateFileExtensions|isTemplate" --type md

Length of output: 1259


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to the new function names
echo "Checking new function name references..."
rg "GetSupportTemplateFileExtensions|IsTemplate" --type go -A 2

# Search specifically in test files
echo "Checking test files..."
fd -e test.go --exec rg -l "GetSupportTemplateFileExtensions|IsTemplate" {}

Length of output: 2186

pkg/catalog/config/template.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@GeorginaReeder
Copy link

Thanks for your contribution @piguagua ! :)

@piguagua
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your contribution @piguagua ! :)

It is my pleasure!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants