Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove old search resource in favor of searchV2 resource #6464

Draft
wants to merge 105 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jinchung
Copy link
Member

@jinchung jinchung commented Feb 19, 2025

Fixes APP-####

What changed (plus any additional context for devs)

  1. Moved over handlers/deeplinks and ClaimCustomization that was still using search/search to now use Christian's new search/searchV2.
  2. Move DiscoverSearch to searchV2
  3. Deleted search/search

Screen recordings / screenshots

What to test

  • Test Discover search results behave as expected
  • Test deeplink handling for the swaps URL flow that it still behaves as expected
  • Test claiming USDC on different networks still works as part of the claim customization flow

…uracy, make fetch return data, expose params to transform, misc. optimizations
jinchung and others added 26 commits February 6, 2025 09:43
)

* Remove unused fromChainId param from search request

* Remove unnecessary threshold param from search request

* Remove unnecessary keys param from search request

* Consolidate verified and unverified results

* Consolidate and set results for crosschain, verified, unverified assets

* Cap max crosschain results to 3

* Consolidate address search vs normal query search
@jinchung jinchung force-pushed the @jin/swap-search-over-query-store branch from d607ea5 to 91e6fc3 Compare February 19, 2025 22:07
@jinchung jinchung changed the title @jin/swap search over query store Remove old search resource in favor of searchV2 resource Feb 21, 2025
Base automatically changed from @christian/query-store-token-search to develop February 28, 2025 00:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants