-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[image] remove azure packages from base image #48762
Conversation
fixes #48733 |
18cacc8
to
f0a4dcb
Compare
head_setup_commands: [] | ||
# - pip install -U azure-cli-core==2.22.0 azure-mgmt-compute==14.0.0 azure-mgmt-msi==1.0.0 azure-mgmt-network==10.2.0 azure-mgmt-resource==13.0.0 | ||
- pip install -U azure-cli-core==2.22.0 azure-mgmt-compute==14.0.0 azure-mgmt-msi==1.0.0 azure-mgmt-network==10.2.0 azure-mgmt-resource==13.0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this 2.22.0 what we expect? in docker/base-deps/Dockerfile we deleted a 2.40.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no idea.. I am waiting for someone to tell me which one to use.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think even azure-cli-core==2.62.0 is too old since it brings an old paramiko==2.12.0. What about we use the latest version now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would guess this thing is 70% chance broken already even without the change.
I just want to remove the ones in the base image, and I am uncommenting this line just as a courtesy. please feel free to changes these to the right version core team thinks this should be, but maybe in a follow up?
or let me the exact line I should put here, and I will just copy it here..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
another idea can be, I can just drop all the versions constraints.. and let pip figure it out by itself...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, I am changing it to be consistent with https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/autoscaler/azure/defaults.yaml#L139
if that one does not work, I am claiming that it is not my fault..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool. We can also ask @gramhagen to take a look
too ancient; and there are no tests. Signed-off-by: Lonnie Liu <[email protected]>
f0a4dcb
to
9d9e063
Compare
shall I merge this? |
I can merge myself. thanks. |
too ancient; and there are no tests.
this should remove the outdated paramiko package from the ray image