use [[(]]) instead of <<(>>) for analysis plots to correct invalid xml syntax

[lobis]

As the title says we cannot use << or >> in the xml (or rml) files if we want it to be valid xml, even though some parsers can tolerate it.

I replaced them by square brackets but any suggestion is welcome.

This issue was discovered when running a tool to check for valid xml files.

[jgalan]

There are other places where we use > would it make sense to search for a different nomenclature?

    <addTask command="restplot-&gt;PlotCombinedCanvas()" value="ON"/>

We might use: restplot.PlotCombinedCanvas().

[lobis]

There are other places where we use > would it make sense to search for a different nomenclature?

    <addTask command="restplot-&gt;PlotCombinedCanvas()" value="ON"/>

We might use: restplot.PlotCombinedCanvas().

I am not familiar at all with TRestAnalysisPlots can you explain further please? I don't understand the issue.

[lobis]

I think I fixed all the problems, I don't think I broke anything with this change but I am not 100% sure as I am not familiar with TRestAnalysisPlots.

[nkx111]

[[xxx]] is a better replacing mark for me

[nkx111]

There are other places where we use > would it make sense to search for a different nomenclature?

    <addTask command="restplot-&gt;PlotCombinedCanvas()" value="ON"/>

We might use: restplot.PlotCombinedCanvas().

We can update TRestTask.cxx to support also restplot.PlotCombinedCanvas().

[jgalan]

There are other places where > is also used, for example inside the globalCut definition, inside TRestAnalysisPlot, the condition value can be something like >10.

When we really want to say greater than, how we could replace this symbol?

Inside TRestDataSet I added 3-new optional fields, such as greaterThan, lowerThan, equals, so that we don't need to introduce the > character.

[jgalan]

Looks fine to me

[jgalan]

Hi @lobis and @juanangp merging this PR made the rawlib validation pipeline fail.

rest-for-physics/rawlib#95

It is possible to trigger the pipelines of few key libraries at the PR in the framework?