Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add check that each light client block has no skipped blocks #15

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

austinabell
Copy link
Contributor

@austinabell austinabell commented Jul 15, 2024

Closes #2

Looking through the tendermint verification, I think this is what we want. Alternatively, we could just check it in the batch so that this light client guest can be re-used for other use cases involving skipping blocks when verifying.

I'll think about this more later, so won't merge yet

@austinabell
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing in favour of #18

@flaub flaub deleted the austin/monotomic branch September 27, 2024 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ensure batch of blocks has no gaps
1 participant