This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
README needs to reflect that the 1.0 vector spec has been ratified #946
+1
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Camel Coder <[email protected]>
brucehoult
reviewed
Mar 17, 2024
README.md
Outdated
| upstream software projects, and is not expected to have incompatible | ||
| changes except if serious issues are discovered during | ||
| ratification. Once ratified, the spec will be given version 2.0. | ||
| has been frozen and ratified. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add words similar to "This repository now represents work towards a future version 2.0"
|
Well, get your PR merged quickly because riscv/riscv-isa-manual#1088 (comment) |
Signed-off-by: Camel Coder <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The vector extension 1.0 specification has been ratified since November 2021, yet there is a curiously repeating pattern of people claiming that it isn't and referencing a version 2.0, which is supposed to be the ratified version. (1, 2)
This very likely goes back to this repo.
From my understanding it hasn't been updated, because this isn't the right place to look for ratified extensions, and more of a development repository.
I for one think that it's very unprofessional to have this repository, which is referenced all over the place, not updated to reflect it's ratification status.