Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Partially revert #283 #286

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

Partially revert #283 #286

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

burrbull
Copy link
Member

@robamu You issue may be related to #283. Try to depend on this change.

@robamu
Copy link

robamu commented Feb 10, 2025

Thanks, that appears to fix the issue. I can regenerate the PAC and there do not seem to be functional changes.

@burrbull burrbull marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2025 15:31
@burrbull burrbull requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 15:31
@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

cc @Emilgardis look like we should merge this and yank 0.4.10. Check of name should cover both derive cases.

@Emilgardis
Copy link
Member

Sorry, I did kinda notice this when reviewing but didn't question it!

@burrbull
Copy link
Member Author

@robamu
As SVD specification does not say anything about how "derive" from array should work when no dim is specified I'd recommend to specify it always.

@burrbull burrbull added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 129cb42 Feb 10, 2025
7 checks passed
@burrbull burrbull deleted the derive-revert branch February 10, 2025 15:42
@robamu
Copy link

robamu commented Feb 10, 2025

I suppose I could patch the vendor provided file.. Thanks for the quick fixes!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants