New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Correct logic in `all-checks` #436

Merged

smoelius merged 1 commit into master from smoelius-patch-1

Dec 14, 2023

Member

smoelius commented Dec 14, 2023

From Defining prerequisite jobs:

If you would like a job to run even if a job it is dependent on did not succeed, use the always() conditional expression in jobs.<job_id>.if.


          Correct logic in all-checks

e6eee10

From [Defining prerequisite jobs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/using-jobs-in-a-workflow#defining-prerequisite-jobs):
> If you would like a job to run even if a job it is dependent on did not succeed, use the `always()` conditional expression in `jobs.<job_id>.if`.

smoelius merged commit 4ff57cc into master

12 checks passed

smoelius deleted the smoelius-patch-1 branch

December 14, 2023 15:07

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet