Omnibus test change branch #58
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* include fork of rspec-snapshot that fails the build when the snapshot is written * confirm missing snapshots fail the build * Revert "confirm missing snapshots fail the build" This reverts commit b4e3dd2.
* graceful exit within abq was masking rspec tests on older versions of rspec * add an additional exit safeguard * check num tests vs expected tests * sanitize backtrace tweaks * regenerate snapshots * break test to ensure bin/check_num_tests.rb works * Revert "break test to ensure bin/check_num_tests.rb works" This reverts commit 1da32a2.
* use captain cli * unset RWX_ACCESS_TOKEN to be compatible with captain-cli
michaelglass
force-pushed
the
omnibus-test-change-branch
branch
from
b7ed95f to
a28a78f
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this is an omnibus branch included a number of test improvements:
if you want to review the code properly, it's going to be easier looking at those individual PRs