-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Multichain] fix: Check all fallbackHandler deployments [SW-236] #4281
Conversation
Branch preview✅ Deploy successful! Storybook: |
eadaab2
to
e98677a
Compare
📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for safe-wallet-webThis analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖
|
Page | Size (compressed) |
---|---|
global |
1004.22 KB (🟡 +49.42 KB) |
Details
The global bundle is the javascript bundle that loads alongside every page. It is in its own category because its impact is much higher - an increase to its size means that every page on your website loads slower, and a decrease means every page loads faster.
Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script>
tag are not accounted for in this analysis
If you want further insight into what is behind the changes, give @next/bundle-analyzer a try!
Fifteen Pages Changed Size
The following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:
Page | Size (compressed) | First Load |
---|---|---|
/ |
511 B (🟢 -24.37 KB) |
1004.72 KB |
/address-book |
26.09 KB (🟡 +5 B) |
1.01 MB |
/apps/open |
54.7 KB (-1 B) |
1.03 MB |
/balances |
30.95 KB (🟡 +14 B) |
1.01 MB |
/balances/nfts |
19.18 KB (-1 B) |
1023.4 KB |
/home |
60.54 KB (🟡 +839 B) |
1.04 MB |
/new-safe/advanced-create |
36.49 KB (🟡 +1.36 KB) |
1.02 MB |
/new-safe/create |
35.75 KB (🟡 +1.36 KB) |
1.02 MB |
/new-safe/load |
16.41 KB (🟡 +10 B) |
1020.63 KB |
/settings/modules |
9.82 KB (🟡 +38 B) |
1014.04 KB |
/settings/notifications |
27.03 KB (-1 B) |
1.01 MB |
/settings/setup |
35.98 KB (🟡 +5 B) |
1.02 MB |
/transactions/tx |
21.07 KB (-2 B) |
1 MB |
/welcome |
6.8 KB (🟢 -1 B) |
1011.02 KB |
/welcome/accounts |
379 B (🟢 -1 B) |
1004.59 KB |
Details
Only the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip.
First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If next/link
is used, subsequent page loads would only need to download that page's bundle (the number in the "Size" column), since the global bundle has already been downloaded.
Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script>
tag are not accounted for in this analysis
Next to the size is how much the size has increased or decreased compared with the base branch of this PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this.
Coverage report
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
Test suite run success1550 tests passing in 206 suites. Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 371afbd |
@@ -35,7 +36,8 @@ export const FallbackHandler = (): ReactElement | null => { | |||
|
|||
const hasFallbackHandler = !!safe.fallbackHandler | |||
const isOfficial = | |||
hasFallbackHandler && safe.fallbackHandler?.value === fallbackHandlerDeployment?.networkAddresses[safe.chainId] | |||
safe.fallbackHandler && | |||
fallbackHandlerDeployments?.networkAddresses[safe.chainId].includes(safe.fallbackHandler.value) | |||
const isTWAPFallbackHandler = safe.fallbackHandler?.value === TWAP_FALLBACK_HANDLER |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know you did not introduce this. But this check is too simplified. There are many chains where no Extensible Fallback handler is deployed e.g. Base.
Maybe we should only allow this on Mainnet, Gnosis Chain, Sepolia and Arbitrum for now as those are the chains where CoW exists?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't isTWAPFallbackHandler
be false on those other chains where its not deployed which is the expected behaviour?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But it just compares an hard coded address:
export const TWAP_FALLBACK_HANDLER = '0x2f55e8b20D0B9FEFA187AA7d00B6Cbe563605bF5'
There are no checks that this address is a contract on a chain so this will always be true when you replay a twap Safe for instance in case someone sets one up with the twap fallback handler.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are the networks where that fallback handler is deployed:
https://github.com/cowprotocol/composable-cow/blob/main/networks.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see. Then lets harden the condition by also checking that the chainId matches one of the deployed networks. I hard-coded the list of those networks provided by the link.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also added some tests for the twap fallback handler message
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ function asDecimal(amount: number | bigint, decimals: number): number { | |||
|
|||
export const TWAP_FALLBACK_HANDLER = '0x2f55e8b20D0B9FEFA187AA7d00B6Cbe563605bF5' | |||
|
|||
// https://github.com/cowprotocol/composable-cow/blob/main/networks.json | |||
export const TWAP_FALLBACK_HANDLER_NETWORKS = ['1', '100', '11155111', '42161'] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: We could also use a mapping chainId -> address here. But maybe we can change it if there are ever multiple addresses.
What it solves
Resolves SW-236
How this PR fixes it
Uses
getCompatibilityFallbackHandlerDeployments
to get all deployment addresses in case there is a canonical and eip155 deployment and checks those addresses to decide whether its an official deployment or notHow to test it
Screenshots
Checklist