Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Static height for project Grid #471

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

Static height for project Grid #471

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2023

Conversation

0xjei
Copy link
Contributor

@0xjei 0xjei commented Dec 11, 2023

Description

To prevent the grid from floating up when the number of projects per page on the grid is less than the maximum, a static grid and grid item height can help prevent this behaviour.

Related Issue

See #447

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Screencast.from.12-12-2023.00.26.20.webm

@0xjei 0xjei requested review from cedoor and vplasencia December 11, 2023 23:31
Copy link
Member

@cedoor cedoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be worth asking the designers what's the best solution for this issue considering UX.

@0xjei 0xjei marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2023 13:35
@0xjei
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xjei commented Dec 12, 2023

It might be worth asking the designers what's the best solution for this issue considering UX.

Switched to Draft until we got feedbacks from designers

@0xjei
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xjei commented Dec 12, 2023

It might be worth asking the designers what's the best solution for this issue considering UX.

Switched to Draft until we got feedbacks from designers

Bumped into the scrollIntoView method and implemented a workaround. The feeling is much better than before and the user interface is smoother af! Any thoughts? @vplasencia @cedoor

Screencast.from.12-12-2023.14.46.45.webm

@vplasencia
Copy link
Member

Hey! @0xjei thanks, I like this new way.

Copy link
Member

@cedoor cedoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, that's what I was thinking about! LGTM

@0xjei 0xjei marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2023 14:54
@0xjei
Copy link
Contributor Author

0xjei commented Dec 12, 2023

Yep, that's what I was thinking about! LGTM

Okay, ready!

@0xjei 0xjei requested a review from cedoor December 12, 2023 14:54
@cedoor cedoor merged commit d5339d2 into chore/website Dec 12, 2023
2 checks passed
@cedoor cedoor deleted the website/447 branch December 19, 2023 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants