ops-feat: static security code scan #309
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughA new workflow file named Changes
Poem
Tip New featuresWalkthrough comment now includes:
Notes:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/njsscan.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/njsscan.yml (4)
1-4: Good security practice noted.The header comments effectively warn about the use of third-party GitHub Actions, which is a good security practice.
6-10: Clear and descriptive workflow setup.The workflow description and name are well-defined, enhancing readability and understanding of the workflow's purpose.
11-18: Workflow triggers are well-configured.The triggers for push, pull request, and scheduled events are correctly set up. Ensure the cron schedule ('23 15 * * 6') aligns with the team's expectations for frequency.
Verify the cron schedule with the team to ensure it meets the project's operational requirements.
20-22: Appropriate permissions configuration.The permissions are set to read-only for contents, adhering to the principle of least privilege.
| jobs: | ||
| njsscan: | ||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: read # for actions/checkout to fetch code | ||
| security-events: write # for github/codeql-action/upload-sarif to upload SARIF results | ||
| actions: read # only required for a private repository by github/codeql-action/upload-sarif to get the Action run status | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| name: njsscan code scanning | ||
| steps: | ||
| - name: Checkout the code | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| - name: nodejsscan scan | ||
| id: njsscan | ||
| uses: ajinabraham/njsscan-action@7237412fdd36af517e2745077cedbf9d6900d711 | ||
| with: | ||
| args: '. --sarif --output results.sarif || true' | ||
| - name: Upload njsscan report | ||
| uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| sarif_file: results.sarif |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well-structured job configuration.
The job configuration is robust, using specific versions of actions to ensure reliability. Consider pinning the github/codeql-action/upload-sarif action to a specific commit or version for consistency with the njsscan action setup.
Consider pinning the github/codeql-action/upload-sarif action to a specific commit or version to match the stability provided by the njsscan action setup.
Summary by CodeRabbit