-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(UI): glitches in ui fixed #32
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes across the four Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ProjectComponent
participant AssetService
participant ProcessComponent
participant Router
User->>ProjectComponent: Initiate asset upload
ProjectComponent->>AssetService: Upload asset
AssetService-->>ProjectComponent: Asset upload status
ProjectComponent->>User: Update UI (uploading status)
User->>ProcessComponent: Click on file
ProcessComponent->>Router: Navigate to download URL
Router-->>User: Download file
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/v0.2.5 #32 +/- ##
==================================================
- Coverage 54.09% 53.97% -0.12%
==================================================
Files 37 37
Lines 1806 1810 +4
==================================================
Hits 977 977
- Misses 829 833 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/[projectId]/page.tsx (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/page.tsx (5 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/page.tsx (1)
66-72
: Verify the impact of removing the post-loading empty projects check.The new implementation handles the case of no projects within the query function, which is more efficient. However, it's important to ensure that this change doesn't introduce any edge cases or negatively impact the user experience.
Please run the following verification steps:
- Test the component with various scenarios (no projects, one project, multiple projects).
- Ensure that the loading state is handled correctly in all cases.
- Verify that the pagination still works as expected when projects exist.
You can use the following script to search for any remaining checks for empty projects that might need to be updated:
This will help ensure that all parts of the component are consistent with the new implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Post-loading empty projects check removal verified.
No remaining checks for empty projects were found in the component, ensuring consistency with the new implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining checks for empty projects rg -i "projects?.length\s*(===?|==)\s*0" --type tsxLength of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining checks for empty projects in .tsx files rg -i "projects?.length\s*(===?|==)\s*0" --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 57
frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/[projectId]/processes/[processId]/page.tsx (5)
7-11
: LGTM: Import changes are consistent with new functionality.The addition of
ProcessData
import aligns with the new functionality introduced in the component.
25-25
: LGTM: File component import added for new UI element.The import of the
File
component is consistent with the new UI elements added to display downloadable file information.
26-26
: LGTM: useRouter hook imported for navigation.The import of
useRouter
fromnext/navigation
is appropriate for implementing programmatic navigation in the newhandleFileClick
function.
Line range hint
1-290
: Summary: File download functionality successfully implemented with minor improvement suggestions.The changes in this file successfully implement the new file download functionality, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing UI glitches. The code is well-structured and consistent. Consider implementing the suggested improvements for error handling, type safety, and accessibility to further enhance the robustness and user experience of the feature.
77-77
: LGTM with suggestions: File download functionality implemented correctly.The new
handleFileClick
function andFile
component usage implement the file download functionality as intended. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling in case
process
is undefined.- Use TypeScript to ensure type safety for the
process
prop inhandleFileClick
.- Enhance accessibility for the
File
component, e.g., by addingaria-label
orrole
attributes.To ensure consistent usage of the new
File
component, run the following script:Also applies to: 107-155
✅ Verification successful
Consistent usage of the
File
component confirmed.The
File
component is consistently imported and utilized across relevant files in the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of the File component across the project # Test: Search for File component usage rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' 'import.*File.*from.*@/components/FileIconCard' rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' '<File'Length of output: 1761
frontend/src/app/(app)/projects/[projectId]/page.tsx (2)
108-109
: Aliasing query properties enhances readabilityAliasing
isFetching
toisAssetsFetching
andrefetch
torefetchAssets
improves code clarity by making the variable names more descriptive and specific to assets.
221-221
: Ensuring assets are refreshed after uploadsCalling
refetchAssets();
after successful uploads ensures the asset list is up-to-date, reflecting the newly uploaded files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/app/api-key-setup/page.tsx (1)
39-39
: Approve the change with a suggestion for improvement.The updated error message provides more specific feedback to the user, which is an improvement. It aligns well with the backend changes mentioned in the PR summary, where invalid API keys are now being checked.
However, to ensure we cover all possible error scenarios, consider the following suggestion:
- toast.error("Invalid API Key. Please try again."); + toast.error(error.response?.data?.detail || "Failed to save API key. Please try again.");This change will display a more specific error message if provided by the backend, or fall back to a generic message if not. This approach maintains the improved specificity while also handling potential other error cases.
backend/app/api/v1/user.py (3)
33-38
: Approve user existence check with a minor suggestion.The addition of a user existence check before proceeding with the API key update is a good practice. It improves error handling and provides a clear message when no users exist.
Consider making the error message more specific:
- raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="No User Exists!") + raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="No users found in the database. Please create a user first.")This change would provide more context to the client about the nature of the error and the next steps to take.
39-45
: Approve API key validation with suggestion for improved error handling.The addition of API key validation before saving is a great improvement. It enhances the robustness of the API and aligns with the frontend changes.
Consider refining the exception handling to catch specific exceptions:
try: requests.get_user_usage_data(api_key_request.api_key) -except Exception: +except requests.RequestException as e: raise HTTPException( - status_code=400, detail="Invalid API Key" + status_code=400, detail=f"Invalid API Key: {str(e)}" ) +except Exception as e: + raise HTTPException( + status_code=500, detail=f"Unexpected error validating API key: {str(e)}" + )This change would provide more specific error messages and distinguish between API key validation errors and other unexpected exceptions.
33-45
: Overall improvements in error handling and API key validation.The changes in this file significantly enhance the robustness of the API, particularly in the
save_user_api_key
function. The addition of user existence checks and API key validation improves error handling and aligns well with the frontend changes mentioned in the AI summary.These modifications will provide clearer feedback to users when issues arise with API key saving or when no users exist in the database. This should lead to a better user experience and easier troubleshooting.
Consider implementing a centralized error handling mechanism for consistent error responses across the API. This could include creating custom exception classes for different types of errors (e.g.,
UserNotFoundError
,InvalidAPIKeyError
) and a global exception handler to ensure uniform error formatting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- backend/app/api/v1/user.py (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/app/api-key-setup/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
* fix(UI): glitches in ui fixed * fix[API_KEY]: error checking invalid api keys on save * refactor[UI]: error handling in UI fixed * fix[file_upload]: refactor error handling state * fix[UI]: small refactory for condition
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes