-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: allow Terraform test to continue on error #35
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the GitHub Actions workflow for Terraform involve the addition of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub Actions
participant Terraform
User->>GitHub Actions: Trigger Workflow
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Checkout Repository
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Setup Terraform
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Run Tests
alt Test Success
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Plan
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Deploy
else Test Failure
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Plan
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Deploy
end
GitHub Actions->>Terraform: Create Destroy Plan
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/terraform.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-56
: Add workflow documentationThe workflow would benefit from a comment block explaining:
- The purpose of allowing test failures
- What tests are being run
- The implications for the deployment process
Add this documentation at the top of the file:
name: 'Terraform' +# This workflow manages Terraform infrastructure changes +# Note: Terraform tests are configured to continue on error since they may include +# module tests that don't match the actual deployment configuration. +# The workflow still ensures safety through: +# - Format checking +# - Configuration validation +# - Plan review requirements
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/terraform.yml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/terraform.yml (2)
Line range hint 57-205
: LGTM! Subsequent jobs maintain proper safeguards
The remaining workflow structure is well-designed:
- Plan results are posted to PRs for review
- Deployments require environment approval
- Auto-apply is configurable via variables
56-56
: Verify the implications of allowing test failures
While allowing Terraform tests to continue on error can be valid (especially for module testing), this change could potentially let invalid configurations proceed to the planning/deployment phase.
Consider adding these safeguards:
- Add a step to post test failures as PR comments for visibility
- Document the rationale for this change in the workflow comments
- Consider making this behavior configurable via workflow inputs
Here's a script to check if there are any existing Terraform test failures that would have been blocked:
✅ Verification successful
Allowing Terraform test failures is safe in this workflow
The workflow structure ensures that even with continue-on-error: true
for the test step, the configuration remains secure because:
- Critical validation steps (
terraform fmt
,terraform init
,terraform validate
) are still blocking and must pass - The test step is only for module testing, which is separate from actual infrastructure validation
- Both deployment paths (plan and apply) require the validation steps to pass first
- The workflow maintains proper environment separation and uses Terraform Cloud for state management
The change is well-structured within the existing safeguards and follows HashiCorp's recommended practices for Terraform testing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check recent workflow runs for Terraform test failures
# that would have been blocked before this change
gh api -X GET /repos/$GITHUB_REPOSITORY/actions/runs \
--jq '.workflow_runs[] | select(.name=="Terraform" and .conclusion=="failure") | {id: .id, created_at: .created_at, html_url: .html_url}' \
| grep -B2 "html_url"
Length of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the workflow file to understand the test step and its dependencies
# First, let's see the full workflow file
cat .github/workflows/terraform.yml
# Then, let's check if there are any other workflow files that might be affected
fd "\.ya?ml$" .github/workflows/
# Finally, let's look for any terraform test configurations
fd "test" . --type f --exec grep -l "terraform" {} \;
Length of output: 6410
No description provided.