Added ObjectBox to vector database comparison #536
Conversation
|
@svonava I think the template YAML is missing causing the CI failure - but could you or someone else in the team confirm? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your submission @anastasia-ragulskaya - here are a few comments:
| "comment": "" | ||
| }, | ||
| "dev_languages": { | ||
| "value": [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is the language (or languages) that ObjectBox is developed in (given the length of your list here, I assume that you understood this as "languages compatible with our SDK") - the eligible values can be seen here:
https://github.com/superlinked/VectorHub/blob/main/docs/tools/vdb_table/vendor.schema.json#L150
(if the language you need isn't on the list, feel free to update vendor.schema.json as a part of this PR)
| "comment": "Partly open source with bindings under Apache 2.0" | ||
| }, | ||
| "license": { | ||
| "value": "Apache 2.0, MIT, proprietory", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in this field, the license is for the vector database part of your offering - is that one Apache2, MIT or proprietary? (the datasync part of your product, if it's separate, should not be taken into account - I assume that one is proprietary?)
"proprietory" is a typo
| "github": "https://github.com/objectbox", | ||
| "website": "https://objectbox.io/", | ||
| "vendor_discussion": "", | ||
| "poc_github": "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you add your (or relevant persons) github profile here so that we can contact you if needed?
| "docs": "https://docs.objectbox.io/", | ||
| "github": "https://github.com/objectbox", | ||
| "website": "https://objectbox.io/", | ||
| "vendor_discussion": "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you create a discussion thread in https://github.com/superlinked/VectorHub/discussions and link it here? (see the other vendor threads for inspiration)
| }, | ||
| "geo_search": { | ||
| "support": "full", | ||
| "source_url": "https://docs.objectbox.io/on-device-vector-search", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To clarify, geo search is about geospatial queries ala https://postgis.net/ - I checked the source briefly but don't see any geospatial search functionality - can you elaborate?
Btw, you can find explanations for what each column here:
https://github.com/superlinked/VectorHub/blob/main/docs/tools/vdb_table/vendor.schema.json
| "multi_vec": { | ||
| "support": "partial", | ||
| "source_url": "https://docs.objectbox.io/on-device-vector-search", | ||
| "comment": " via Relations " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
always important to link the most specific source, i.e. here it might be https://docs.objectbox.io/relations
also, can you elaborate on how you get "Ability to create and index multiple vectors for a given document" via relations?
| "comment": "" | ||
| }, | ||
| "managed_cloud": { | ||
| "support": "no", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
permissible values are empty, none, partial, full
see: https://github.com/superlinked/VectorHub/blob/main/docs/tools/vdb_table/vendor.schema.json#L70
| }, | ||
| "multi_tenancy": { | ||
| "support": "full", | ||
| "source_url": "https://docs.objectbox.io/on-device-vector-search", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you point specifically to "the ability to store multiple isolated indexes within one database instance" (this is what multi-tenancy means)
| "source_url": "", | ||
| "comment": "" | ||
| }, | ||
| "sharding": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"The search index is sharded across multiple machines." - can you point to docs that explain how you do that?
The schema is there[1], the PR failed validation because it doesn't match the schema currently[2]. [1] https://github.com/superlinked/VectorHub/blob/main/docs/tools/vdb_table/vendor.schema.json |
This pull request adds ObjectBox database to the vector database comparison table.