Skip to content

The technical implementation guide for the tri-deparmental price transparency rule.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

tdfow/price-transparency-guide

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

CMS Transparency in Coverage

Transparency in Coverage

The technical implementation guide for the machine readable files as required by the Transparency in Coverage final rules (85 FR 72158).

Overview

This repository contains a set of schemas describing a data format (example implementations are encoded as JSON and XML) for the Transparency in Coverage final rule. All machine-readable files must conform to a non-proprietary, open standards format that is platform independent and made available to the public without restrictions that would impede the re-use of that information.

Background

The Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (the Departments) have issued the Transparency in Coverage final rules (85 FR 72158) on November 12, 2020. The final rules require non-grandfathered group health plans and health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets (plans and issuers) to disclose certain pricing information. Under the final rules a plan or issuer must disclose in-network negotiated rates, billed and out-of-network allowed, and in-network drug prices (including both "negotiated rates" and "historical net prices") through three machine-readable files posted on an internet website.

Plans and issuers are required to make these files public for plan or policy years beginning on or after July 1, 2022.

Keeping Up To Date

Github allows for people to track and keep up-to-date with any changes for any repository. If you wish to follow and track the changes that happen on this repo, please leverage the "Watch" feature found at the top of the repository and select "All activity". This will email the user that has "watched" the specific repository.

Guidance

Transparency in Coverage rule guidance is released on CMS' website. You can find recently released guidance here:

Developer Documentation

Transport mechanism - HTTPS

All machine-readable files must be made available via HTTPS.

Content type - Non-Proprietary, Open Format

There are plenty of great formats to work with that will meet the needs for Transparency in Coverage:

Examples of proprietary formats that do not meet this definition would be:

Public Discoverability

These machine-readable files must be made available to the public without restrictions that would impede the re-use of that information.

The location of the these URLs must be provided over HTTPS to ensure the integrity of the data.

Robots.txt

To allow for search engine discoverability, neither a robots.txt file nor meta tag on the page where the files are hosted will have rules such that give instructions to web crawlers to not index the page.

This is typically follows the format of <meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow"> or for a robots.txt file using the Disallow directive.

Special Data Types

Dates should be strings in ISO 8601 format (e.g. YYYY-MM-DD).

Different Flat Files

There are three required flat files associated with Transparency in Coverage:

  • In-Network Negotiated Rates
  • Out-Of-Network Allowed Amounts
  • In-Network Prescription Drugs
    • NOTE: Per released guidance, the departments will defer enforcement of the TiC Final Rules’ requirement of the prescription drug pricing file pending further rulemaking.

In-Network Negotiated Rates File Under the finalized rules, a plan or issuer must disclose in-network provider negotiated rates for all items and services through a machine-readable file.

Out-Of-Network Allowed Amounts File Under the finalized rules, a plan or issuer must disclose certain data elements to the public, including the billed and allowed amounts for out-of-network providers, through a machine-readable file.

In-Network Prescription Drugs File Under the finalized rules, a plan or issuer must disclose in-network prescription drug's historical net price and negotiated rate through a machine-readable file.

The associated names for those files are:

  • in-network-rates
  • allowed-amounts
  • prescription-drugs

File Naming Convention

The following is the required naming standard for each file: <YYYY-MM-DD>_<payer or issuer name>_<plan name>_<file type name>.<file extension> For payer or issuer's names and plan names that have spaces (i.e. "healthplan 100"), those spaces would be replaced with dashes -

Only alphanumeric characters are allowed in the file name. No special characters such as ' are allowed. Special characters are either to be removed completely or replaced with -.

For example, the following would be the required naming for CMS building a JSON file:

  • 2020-01-05_cms_medicare_in-network-rates.json
  • 2020-01-05_cms_medicare_allowed-amounts.json
  • 2020-01-05_cms_medicare_prescription-drugs.json

An example of a plan named healthcare 100 with an issuer's name issuer abc producing a JSON file, the following would be the naming output:

  • 2020-01-05_issuer-abc_healthcare-100_in-network-rates.json
  • 2020-01-05_issuer-abc_healthcare-100_allowed-amounts.json
  • 2020-01-05_issuer-abc_healthcare-100_prescription-drugs.json

Schemas

Examples

Getting Involved

The healthcare ecosystem is complex with what seems like an infinite amount of plan and issuer implementations. There are no doubt going to be questions for these various situations and the requirements found in the Transparency in Coverage rule. Currently, there are two ways in which the community can get involved:

  • Github Issues - Where people discuss issues related to the project.
  • Github Discussions - Use these channels for conversational topics (for example, "How do I…" or "What do you think about…" instead of bug reports or feature requests).

Before posting a comment, issue, or question, please search through existing discussions and issues. There is a good chance that the topic in questions is already being discussed.

Versioning

With any type software development, progression happens through bug fixes, new content, or changing requirements. The technical development of this schema is no different. CMS will be following the standard versioning found in many software development projects with including a major, minor, and patch number to represent the current version of the schema. The following is the guiding principles for version updates:

MAJOR version when incompatible changes are introduced, MINOR version when attributes/values are introduced or removed in a backwards compatible manner, and PATCH version when backwards compatible bug fixes are introduced.

The major version will be finalized to 1.0.0 for the schema to adhere to the July 2022 implementation date. Versioning of the schema can be tracked in the VERSION.md file.

About

The technical implementation guide for the tri-deparmental price transparency rule.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published