Compactness for classical propositional logic is a constructive taboo #341
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ncfavier
reviewed
Jan 12, 2024
ncfavier
reviewed
Jan 12, 2024
|
Fixed a merge conflict with the EDIT: I lied, looks like instance resolution is getting confused |
ncfavier
previously approved these changes
Jan 21, 2024
plt-amy
reviewed
Jan 22, 2024
ncfavier
previously approved these changes
Jan 25, 2024
plt-amy
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR proves that compactness for classical propositional logic is a constructive taboo. It also defines weak excluded middle, and adds some helpers for working with types with cardinality 0.