Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update foreman-maintain before stopping services #1865

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

evgeni
Copy link
Member

@evgeni evgeni commented Oct 15, 2024

This ensures any possible fixes for process handling are available.

This ensures any possible fixes for process handling are available.
@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Oct 15, 2024

I am unsure I want to keep this forever (as it's how a Satellite upgrade works under the hood) and update our docs, or just use it to test the fix for https://community.theforeman.org/t/katello-nightly-rpm-pipeline-2155-failed/39693/ and backport the actual fix to the 1.7.z branch afterwards.

@evgeni evgeni merged commit 7ec68c5 into theforeman:master Oct 15, 2024
8 checks passed
@evgeni evgeni deleted the update-maintain branch October 15, 2024 12:52
Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like to avoid keeping this forever.

In fact, what I'd prefer is that we find a solution where we don't need foreman-maintain at all to stop the services. I've always wonder if we can define a foreman.target and somehow get systemd to do the hard work.

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Oct 15, 2024

FWIW, https://ci.theforeman.org/job/katello-nightly-rpm-pipeline/2168/ passed with this, so I'll go about to backport that change to 1.7.x and we can revert this

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Oct 16, 2024

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented Oct 18, 2024

#1867

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants