-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stricter sparsevctrs tests #1204
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Related to tidymodels/workflows#246.
I agree that this is the direction we want to be taking!
Leaving review as Comment due to the comment beginning with "These tests now test..."—I think we ought to be testing each of the 4 options x engine_supports_sparsity combinations, but are only testing 2.
This pull request has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue. |
All sparsvctrs tests now have option set such that unintentional materialization results in an error.
In addition, we now error on formula interface for sparse data, due to the
model.matrix()
issue we are running into