units tests for tunable postproc and some work on #194

tests/testthat/helper-tunable.R

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+check_tunable <- function(x) {
+  expect_equal(names(x), c("name", "call_info", "source", "component", "component_id"))
+  expect_equal(class(x$name), "character")
+  expect_equal(class(x$call_info), "list")
+  expect_equal(class(x$source), "character")
+  expect_equal(class(x$component), "character")
+  expect_equal(class(x$component_id), "character")
+
+  for (i in seq_along(x$call_info)) {
+    check_call_info(x$call_info[[i]])
+  }
+
+  invisible(TRUE)
+}
+
+check_call_info <- function(x) {
+  if (all(is.null(x))) {
+    # it is possible that engine parameter do not have call info
+    return(invisible(TRUE))
+  }
+  expect_true(all(c("pkg", "fun") %in% names(x)))
+  expect_equal(class(x$pkg), "character")
+  expect_equal(class(x$fun), "character")
+  invisible(TRUE)
+}

tests/testthat/test-generics.R

@@ -37,3 +37,138 @@ test_that("can compute required packages of a workflow - recipes", {
 
   expect_true("pkg" %in% generics::required_pkgs(workflow))
 })
+
+# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# tunable()
+
+test_that("workflow with no tunable parameters", {
+  skip_if_not_installed("modeldata")
+  library(modeldata)
+  data("Chicago")
+
+  rm_rec <- recipes::recipe(ridership ~ ., data = head(Chicago)) %>%
+    recipes::step_rm(date, ends_with("away"))
+  lm_model <- parsnip::linear_reg() %>% parsnip::set_engine("lm")
+  wflow_untunable <- workflow(rm_rec, lm_model)
+
+  wflow_info <- tunable(wflow_untunable)
+  check_tunable(wflow_info)
+  expect_equal(nrow(wflow_info), 0)
+})
+
+
+test_that("extract tuning from workflow with tunable recipe", {
+  skip_if_not_installed("modeldata")
+  library(modeldata)
+  data("Chicago")
+
+  spline_rec <- recipes::recipe(ridership ~ ., data = head(Chicago)) %>%
+    recipes::step_date(date) %>%
+    recipes::step_holiday(date) %>%
+    recipes::step_rm(date, ends_with("away")) %>%
+    recipes::step_impute_knn(recipes::all_predictors(),
+                             neighbors = hardhat::tune("imputation")) %>%
+    recipes::step_other(recipes::all_nominal(), threshold = hardhat::tune()) %>%
+    recipes::step_dummy(recipes::all_nominal()) %>%
+    recipes::step_normalize(recipes::all_predictors()) %>%
+    recipes::step_bs(recipes::all_predictors(),
+                     deg_free = hardhat::tune(), degree = hardhat::tune())
+  lm_model <- parsnip::linear_reg() %>%
+    parsnip::set_engine("lm")
+  wflow_tunable_recipe <- workflow(spline_rec, lm_model)
+
+  wflow_info <- tunable(wflow_tunable_recipe)
+  check_tunable(wflow_info)
+  expect_true(all(wflow_info$source == "recipe"))
+})
+
+test_that("extract tuning from workflow with tunable model", {
+  skip_if_not_installed("modeldata")
+  library(modeldata)
+  data("Chicago")
+
+  rm_rec <- recipes::recipe(ridership ~ ., data = head(Chicago)) %>%
+    recipes::step_rm(date, ends_with("away"))
+  bst_model <-
+    parsnip::boost_tree(mode = "classification", trees = hardhat::tune("funky name \n")) %>%
+    parsnip::set_engine("C5.0", rules = hardhat::tune(), noGlobalPruning = TRUE)
+  wflow_tunable_model <- workflow(rm_rec, bst_model)
+
+  wflow_info <- tunable(wflow_tunable_model)
+  check_tunable(wflow_info)
+  expect_true(all(wflow_info$source == "model_spec"))
+})
+
+test_that("extract tuning from workflow with tunable postprocessor", {
+  wflow <- workflow()
+  wflow <- add_recipe(wflow, recipes::recipe(mpg ~ ., mtcars))
+  wflow <- add_model(wflow, parsnip::linear_reg())
+  wflow <- add_tailor(
+    wflow,
+    tailor::tailor() %>%
+      tailor::adjust_numeric_range(lower_limit = hardhat::tune())
+  )
+
+  wflow_info <- tunable(wflow)
+
+  check_tunable(wflow_info)
+  expect_true(all(wflow_info$source == "tailor"))
+})
+
+test_that("extract tuning from workflow with tunable recipe and model", {
+  skip_if_not_installed("modeldata")
+  library(modeldata)
+  data("Chicago")
+
+  spline_rec <- recipes::recipe(ridership ~ ., data = head(Chicago)) %>%
+    recipes::step_date(date) %>%
+    recipes::step_holiday(date) %>%
+    recipes::step_rm(date, ends_with("away")) %>%
+    recipes::step_impute_knn(recipes::all_predictors(),
+                             neighbors = hardhat::tune("imputation")) %>%
+    recipes::step_other(recipes::all_nominal(), threshold = hardhat::tune()) %>%
+    recipes::step_dummy(recipes::all_nominal()) %>%
+    recipes::step_normalize(recipes::all_predictors()) %>%
+    recipes::step_bs(recipes::all_predictors(),
+                     deg_free = hardhat::tune(), degree = hardhat::tune())
+  bst_model <-
+    parsnip::boost_tree(mode = "classification", trees = hardhat::tune("funky name \n")) %>%
+    parsnip::set_engine("C5.0", rules = hardhat::tune(), noGlobalPruning = TRUE)
+  wflow_tunable <- workflow(spline_rec, bst_model)
+
+  wflow_info <- tunable(wflow_tunable)
+  check_tunable(wflow_info)
+  expect_equal(
+    sort(unique(wflow_info$source)),
+    c("model_spec", "recipe")
+  )
+})
+
+test_that("extract tuning from workflow with tunable recipe, model, and tailor", {
+  wflow <- workflow()
+  wflow <- add_recipe(
+    wflow,
+    recipes::recipe(mpg ~ ., mtcars) %>%
+      recipes::step_impute_knn(
+        recipes::all_predictors(),
+        neighbors = hardhat::tune("imputation")
+      )
+  )
+  wflow <- add_model(
+    wflow,
+    parsnip::linear_reg(engine = "glmnet", penalty = tune())
+  )
+  wflow <- add_tailor(
+    wflow,
+    tailor::tailor() %>%
+      tailor::adjust_numeric_range(lower_limit = hardhat::tune())
+  )
+
+  wflow_info <- tunable(wflow)
+
+  check_tunable(wflow_info)
+  expect_equal(
+    sort(unique(wflow_info$source)),
+    c("model_spec", "recipe", "tailor")
+  )
+})