Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PD-1612 / 25.04 / PD-1612-document-new-fields-for-disk-replacement #3428

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

linzi-ix
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for contributing to TrueNAS documentation! By opening a Pull Request, you're acknowledging that your changes will be distributed under the Creative Commons 4.0 license.

@linzi-ix linzi-ix requested a review from a team as a code owner January 14, 2025 18:33
@bugclerk bugclerk changed the title PD-1612-document-new-fields-for-disk-replacement PD-1612 / 25.04 / PD-1612-document-new-fields-for-disk-replacement Jan 14, 2025
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

@micjohnson777 micjohnson777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work. Just a few suggestions from the style guide and tips for UI ref content descriptions.

@micjohnson777 micjohnson777 added the Technical Writer Review (MJ) A technical writer is reviewing the PR. label Jan 15, 2025
@DjP-iX DjP-iX merged commit 3dbf853 into master Jan 24, 2025
3 checks passed
@DjP-iX DjP-iX deleted the PD-1612-document-new-fields-for-disk-replacement branch January 24, 2025 17:41
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been merged and conversations have been locked.
If you would like to discuss more about this issue please use our forums or raise a Jira ticket.

@truenas truenas locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Re-Review Technical Writer Review (MJ) A technical writer is reviewing the PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants