Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NAS-133709 / 25.04 / Do not import middleware API in ZFS process pool #15455

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

themylogin
Copy link
Contributor

@themylogin themylogin commented Jan 21, 2025

Previously, ZFS process pool was importing pydantic API. Middleware was waiting for it to finish during the startup (as middleware startup calls ZFS modules). The middleware startup time included 3 pydantic API import waits (middleware itself + 3 ZFS workers).

Now, it's only importing pydantic API once.

@themylogin themylogin requested a review from a team January 21, 2025 19:50
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

@bugclerk bugclerk changed the title Do not import middleware API in ZFS process pool NAS-133709 / 25.04 / Do not import middleware API in ZFS process pool Jan 21, 2025
@themylogin themylogin force-pushed the fix-performance branch 3 times, most recently from 1bb63cd to a549543 Compare January 21, 2025 20:13
@themylogin
Copy link
Contributor Author

themylogin commented Jan 21, 2025

@themylogin
Copy link
Contributor Author

time 3:00

@truenas truenas deleted a comment from bugclerk Jan 21, 2025
@themylogin themylogin merged commit b7f0128 into master Jan 23, 2025
2 checks passed
@themylogin themylogin deleted the fix-performance branch January 23, 2025 19:44
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been merged and conversations have been locked.
If you would like to discuss more about this issue please use our forums or raise a Jira ticket.

@truenas truenas locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants