chore: state poc #37
chore: state poc #37
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates dependency management and runbook execution. In the Cargo.toml file, version specifications for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant R as Runbook Executor
participant F as File System (State File)
participant C as Snapshot Context
U->>R: Initiate runbook execution
R->>R: Use DEFAULT_ENVIRONMENT for configuration
R->>F: Check for state_file_location
alt State file exists
F-->>R: Return execution snapshot
R->>C: Create RunbookSnapshotContext with snapshot
C-->>R: Simulate runbook flows and generate diff (ctx.diff)
R->>R: Update plans based on diff
else No state file found
R->>R: Execute runbook without snapshot enhancements
end
R->>R: Start unsupervised runbook runloop
alt Execution error occurs
R->>F: Write runbook state to specified location
end
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
crates/cli/src/runbook/mod.rs (1)
89-96: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove error handling for runloop.
The function returns
Ok(())even when there are errors in the runloop. Consider propagating the error or at least logging it.if let Err(diags) = res { println!("{} Execution aborted", red!("x")); + log::error!("Runloop execution failed"); for diag in diags.iter() { println!("{}", format!("- {}", diag)); + log::error!("- {}", diag); } - // write_runbook_transient_state(&mut runbook, runbook_state)?; - return Ok(()); + return Err("Runloop execution failed".to_string()); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
crates/cli/src/runbook/mod.rs (1)
82-84: Improve error handling for snapshot loading.Consider logging the error for better debugging and error tracking.
- Err(e) => { - println!("{} {}", red!("x"), e); - } + Err(e) => { + log::error!("Failed to load execution snapshot: {}", e); + println!("{} {}", red!("x"), e); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
crates/cli/Cargo.toml(2 hunks)crates/cli/src/runbook/mod.rs(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
crates/cli/src/runbook/mod.rs (1)
25-25: LGTM!Good refactoring to centralize the environment configuration by introducing a constant.
crates/cli/Cargo.toml (1)
51-51: Empty feature declaration.The
explorerfeature is empty. Consider:
- Adding the required dependencies and functionality, or
- Removing the feature if it's not needed.
| } | ||
| std::process::exit(1); | ||
| } | ||
| let _ = runbook.write_runbook_state(runbook_state_location)?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle the state writing result.
The result of writing the runbook state is ignored with let _. Consider handling potential errors.
- let _ = runbook.write_runbook_state(runbook_state_location)?;
+ runbook.write_runbook_state(runbook_state_location)?;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let _ = runbook.write_runbook_state(runbook_state_location)?; | |
| runbook.write_runbook_state(runbook_state_location)?; |
| txtx-core = { path = "../../../txtx/crates/txtx-core" } | ||
| txtx-addon-network-svm = { package = "txtx-addon-network-svm", path = "../../../txtx/addons/svm" } | ||
| # txtx-core = { version = "0.2.2" } | ||
| # txtx-addon-network-svm = { version = "0.1.3" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify external dependencies.
The dependencies are using paths outside the repository (../../../txtx/), which could cause issues with reproducible builds. Consider:
- Moving these dependencies into the repository, or
- Publishing them to crates.io and using version specifications.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the external dependencies exist and are accessible.
# Test: Check if the txtx-core path exists
if [ -d "../../../txtx/crates/txtx-core" ]; then
echo "txtx-core path exists"
else
echo "txtx-core path does not exist"
fi
# Test: Check if the txtx-addon-network-svm path exists
if [ -d "../../../txtx/addons/svm" ]; then
echo "txtx-addon-network-svm path exists"
else
echo "txtx-addon-network-svm path does not exist"
fiLength of output: 245
External Dependencies Missing – Action Required
The verification confirms that both dependency paths (../../../txtx/crates/txtx-core and ../../../txtx/addons/svm) do not exist. This outcome directly supports the concern that these external path dependencies could lead to reproducibility issues. It is advisable to either incorporate these dependencies into the repository or publish them to crates.io and use version specifications to avoid future build complications.
- Location:
crates/cli/Cargo.toml(lines 19-22)
|
Superseded by #38 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores