Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/tss-1064-display-related-barriers #638

Closed
wants to merge 66 commits into from

Conversation

osimuka
Copy link
Contributor

@osimuka osimuka commented Nov 3, 2023

No description provided.

@osimuka osimuka self-assigned this Nov 7, 2023
@osimuka osimuka requested review from ferozerub, Santino-Trade and chris-pettinga and removed request for ferozerub and Santino-Trade November 7, 2023 13:30
@osimuka osimuka marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2023 13:30
chris-pettinga and others added 24 commits November 15, 2023 16:33
…-barriers' into feature/TSS-1064-display-related-barriers
* moving ML requirements to another file and seeing if that fixes deployment

* fixed Procfile

* moving collectstatic to Procfile

* Added numpy to requirements-related-barriers.txt

* moving stuff to .profile

* updating .profile

* updating .profile

* adding shell to .profile and changing Dockerfile to install the new requirements file

* removing activation of virtualenv

* moving import statement to make debugging easier

* isntalling sentence-transofmrers directly in the .profile without deps and explicitly installing cpu-only torch

* removing tmpdir, no neeed for it now

* Revert "removing tmpdir, no neeed for it now"

This reverts commit faa8690.

* updated dockerfile

* playing around with removing additional requirements-related-barriers.txt

* added the good stuff to dev dependencies so removed from Dockerfile. Now only good stuff is in deployment .profile

* updating Dockerfile for no change

* reorganising imports

* adding comments

* removing collectstatic

* readdding collectstatic
…ame not a queryset. (#680)

Similarity score now - as part of this dataframe - gets passed to the serializer for response.

Removed caching as we want to test quickly and will be fixed as part of a different ticket
@abarolo
Copy link
Contributor

abarolo commented Jan 15, 2024

Can we add some unit tests to test the view works and some to test get_similar_barriers?

@osimuka
Copy link
Contributor Author

osimuka commented Jan 15, 2024

Can we add some unit tests to test the view works and some to test get_similar_barriers?

Yes we can add tests, since its an ML functionality, the main tests will be mocked data and making sure functions are being called.

@osimuka osimuka added the do not merge Do not merge me label Jan 17, 2024
@abarolo abarolo closed this Feb 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do not merge Do not merge me
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants