Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix clang-format workflow #1234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

mcbarton
Copy link
Contributor

@mcbarton mcbarton commented Feb 4, 2025

The clang format workflow is broken because it tries to get a git-clang-format by wgetting it. Git-clang-format is not used as far as I can tell from the workflow, so should be safe to just remove the 'Download git-clang-format' section of the workflow.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.64%. Comparing base (92f3acc) to head (dbb32ae).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1234   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.64%   94.64%           
=======================================
  Files          51       51           
  Lines        8890     8890           
=======================================
  Hits         8414     8414           
  Misses        476      476           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Differentiator/StmtClone.cpp 64.63% <ø> (ø)
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Differentiator/StmtClone.cpp 64.63% <ø> (ø)

Copy link
Owner

@vgvassilev vgvassilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let’s see if that works out.

@vgvassilev vgvassilev merged commit 0739a5b into vgvassilev:master Feb 4, 2025
98 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants