Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "has storage access" boolean to environment #10990

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bvandersloot-mozilla
Copy link

This is a concept that originated in the Storage Access API, where it has been stuck because of spec issues between Fetch and 6265bis. To un-logjam this, I've started whatwg/fetch#1807. That depends on this bit existing.

This patch adds the bit, which remains false, and does nothing.

  • At least two implementers are interested (and none opposed):
  • Tests are written and can be reviewed and commented upon at:
    • change is not observable, not needed?
  • Implementation bugs are filed:
    • change is to update spec interfacing, not needed?
  • Corresponding HTML AAM & ARIA in HTML issues & PRs:
  • MDN issue is filed:
    • I don't think this is needed?
  • The top of this comment includes a clear commit message to use.

(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)

This is a concept that originated in the Storage Access API, where it
has been stuck because of spec issues between Fetch and 6265bis. To
un-logjam this, I've started whatwg/fetch#1807.
That depends on this bit existing.

This patch adds the bit, which remains false, and does nothing.
@johannhof
Copy link
Member

To clarify, is this change integrating https://privacycg.github.io/storage-access/#ua-state into HTML? cc @cfredric

If so, that seems fine by me, but I wonder if it should be part of a larger port of the storage access API (🍾 ?)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants