Move Policy cost modifiers to mod constants #12983
Open
+7
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yairm210
reviewed
Feb 20, 2025
Comment on lines
+102
to
+104
| var policyBase = 25 | ||
| var policyMultiplier = 6 | ||
| var policyExponent = 1.7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I actually really don't like this, I'm thinking of using something like https://github.com/fasseg/exp4j to allow arbitrary functions given base values but this will require experimentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Civ6/Civ7 uses a predetermined cost per policy, such would probably be better implemented in a similar way as how tech costs are implemented currently. I'm not sure if there's much demand for highly costomizeable culture cost formulas, the difference in the formulae for regular policies in G&K and BNW can be implemented via mod constants like this, although Ideology policies are in their own 'pool' for culture cost calculation.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BNW apparently uses a modifier of 3 instead of 6 and an exponent of 2.01 instead of 1.7.