-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature(group): add group setitem api #2393
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
77115ff
feature(group): add group setitem api
jhamman ed67cc3
arrays proxy
jhamman 6e8f3da
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr-python…
jhamman 4ab2698
rollback to simple version
jhamman 056398e
rollback deprecation
jhamman 804cf12
rollback ...
jhamman 2dafa7e
Update tests/test_group.py
jhamman 255f384
Merge branch 'main' into feature/group-setitem
jhamman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could use some opinions here!
On one hand,
iter(group.arrays)
is nice and tidy. But it also doesn't match the existing API (group.arrays()
) and there are other methods where symetry seems useful (array_keys
,array_values
, etc.).@d-v-b - you'll have an opinion here :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what breaks if we remove
__call__
? I feel like that's redundant if you can just iterate. And then we could addkeys
andvalues
methods to theArraysProxy
object that lossily call__iter__
, thereby replacingarray_keys
andarray_values
?We end up with a kind of a weird data structure -- something that's asymptotically a dict? But I think that also matches the semantics of "lots of stuff stored on disk with unique names".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lots of stuff that looks like this (from our test suite):
Looking at 2.18, I'm realizing we also are missing the
recurse
option toGroup.arrays(recurse: bool = False)
...All of this makes me think it may be asking too much to overload
.arrays
with setiem/getitem/iter/etc.