generated from ziyadedher/webdev-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(deps): update dependency next to v14.2.21 [security] #202
Open
renovate
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
renovate/npm-next-vulnerability
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
6bc1be9
to
dac30ea
Compare
dac30ea
to
d061885
Compare
d061885
to
5588265
Compare
5588265
to
a6efebc
Compare
a6efebc
to
e4db5b9
Compare
e4db5b9
to
a6aa283
Compare
a6aa283
to
7bf4a7b
Compare
7bf4a7b
to
12dc7be
Compare
12dc7be
to
5793467
Compare
5793467
to
c3bc415
Compare
c3bc415
to
2d7753d
Compare
2d7753d
to
8e89c83
Compare
8e89c83
to
959f840
Compare
959f840
to
8f9ff8a
Compare
6116061
to
f8d45b0
Compare
f8d45b0
to
1b3ca6d
Compare
1b3ca6d
to
a81048a
Compare
a81048a
to
fd12df1
Compare
fd12df1
to
25b39b1
Compare
25b39b1
to
fbf32e9
Compare
fbf32e9
to
be44e34
Compare
be44e34
to
79c3bdb
Compare
79c3bdb
to
51d8286
Compare
51d8286
to
097f008
Compare
097f008
to
d20cdbf
Compare
d20cdbf
to
b2fffbf
Compare
b2fffbf
to
ff7d6ec
Compare
ff7d6ec
to
e78a7a7
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
0 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
14.0.4
->14.2.21
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2024-34351
Impact
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in Next.js Server Actions by security researchers at Assetnote. If the
Host
header is modified, and the below conditions are also met, an attacker may be able to make requests that appear to be originating from the Next.js application server itself.Prerequisites
<14.1.1
) is running in a self-hosted* manner./
.* Many hosting providers (including Vercel) route requests based on the Host header, so we do not believe that this vulnerability affects any Next.js applications where routing is done in this manner.
Patches
This vulnerability was patched in #62561 and fixed in Next.js
14.1.1
.Workarounds
There are no official workarounds for this vulnerability. We recommend upgrading to Next.js
14.1.1
.Credit
Vercel and the Next.js team thank Assetnote for responsibly disclosing this issue to us, and for working with us to verify the fix. Thanks to:
Adam Kues - Assetnote
Shubham Shah - Assetnote
CVE-2024-46982
Impact
By sending a crafted HTTP request, it is possible to poison the cache of a non-dynamic server-side rendered route in the pages router (this does not affect the app router). When this crafted request is sent it could coerce Next.js to cache a route that is meant to not be cached and send a
Cache-Control: s-maxage=1, stale-while-revalidate
header which some upstream CDNs may cache as well.To be potentially affected all of the following must apply:
pages/dashboard.tsx
notpages/blog/[slug].tsx
The below configurations are unaffected:
Patches
This vulnerability was resolved in Next.js v13.5.7, v14.2.10, and later. We recommend upgrading regardless of whether you can reproduce the issue or not.
Workarounds
There are no official or recommended workarounds for this issue, we recommend that users patch to a safe version.
Credits
CVE-2024-47831
Impact
The image optimization feature of Next.js contained a vulnerability which allowed for a potential Denial of Service (DoS) condition which could lead to excessive CPU consumption.
Not affected:
next.config.js
file is configured withimages.unoptimized
set totrue
orimages.loader
set to a non-default value.Patches
This issue was fully patched in Next.js
14.2.7
. We recommend that users upgrade to at least this version.Workarounds
Ensure that the
next.config.js
file has eitherimages.unoptimized
,images.loader
orimages.loaderFile
assigned.Credits
Brandon Dahler (brandondahler), AWS
Dimitrios Vlastaras
CVE-2024-51479
Impact
If a Next.js application is performing authorization in middleware based on pathname, it was possible for this authorization to be bypassed.
Patches
This issue was patched in Next.js
14.2.15
and later.If your Next.js application is hosted on Vercel, this vulnerability has been automatically mitigated, regardless of Next.js version.
Workarounds
There are no official workarounds for this vulnerability.
Credits
We'd like to thank tyage (GMO CyberSecurity by IERAE) for responsible disclosure of this issue.
CVE-2024-56332
Impact
A Denial of Service (DoS) attack allows attackers to construct requests that leaves requests to Server Actions hanging until the hosting provider cancels the function execution.
Note: Next.js server is idle during that time and only keeps the connection open. CPU and memory footprint are low during that time.
Deployments without any protection against long running Server Action invocations are especially vulnerable. Hosting providers like Vercel or Netlify set a default maximum duration on function execution to reduce the risk of excessive billing.
This is the same issue as if the incoming HTTP request has an invalid
Content-Length
header or never closes. If the host has no other mitigations to those then this vulnerability is novel.This vulnerability affects only Next.js deployments using Server Actions.
Patches
This vulnerability was resolved in Next.js 14.2.21, 15.1.2, and 13.5.8. We recommend that users upgrade to a safe version.
Workarounds
There are no official workarounds for this vulnerability.
Credits
Thanks to the PackDraw team for responsibly disclosing this vulnerability.
Release Notes
vercel/next.js (next)
v14.2.21
Compare Source
v14.2.20
Compare Source
v14.2.19
Compare Source
Core Changes
Misc Changes
Credits
Huge thanks to @ztanner and @ijjk for helping!
v14.2.18
Compare Source
v14.2.17
Compare Source
v14.2.16
Compare Source
v14.2.15
Compare Source
Core Changes
Credits
Huge thanks to @ztanner, @agadzik, @huozhi, @styfle, @icyJoseph and @wyattjoh for helping!
v14.2.14
Compare Source
Core Changes
Credits
Huge thanks to @styfle, @ztanner, @ijjk, @huozhi and @wyattjoh for helping!
v14.2.13
Compare Source
v14.2.12
Compare Source
v14.2.11
Compare Source
v14.2.10
Compare Source
v14.2.9
Compare Source
v14.2.8
Compare Source
v14.2.7
Compare Source
v14.2.6
Compare Source
v14.2.5
Compare Source
v14.2.4
Compare Source
Core Changes
Credits
Huge thanks to @ztanner, @ijjk, @wbinnssmith, @huozhi, and @lubieowoce for helping!
v14.2.3
Compare Source
v14.2.2
Compare Source
v14.2.1
Compare Source
v14.2.0
Compare Source
v14.1.4
Compare Source
v14.1.3
Compare Source
v14.1.2
Compare Source
v14.1.1
Compare Source
Note: this is a backport release for critical bug fixes -- this does not include all pending features/changes on canary
Core Changes
Credits
Huge thanks to @huozhi, @shuding, @Ethan-Arrowood, @styfle, @ijjk, @ztanner, @balazsorban44, @kdy1, and @williamli for helping!
v14.1.0
Compare Source
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.