Convert byte_extract parser to Rust.

[jlucovsky]

Convert the byte_extract option parser from C to Rust.

Link to redmine ticket: 6873

Describe changes:

• Refactor code in rust/src/detect to support re-usability
• Implement the byte_extract parser in Rust, with unittests
• Modify the existing byte_extract module to use the Rust parser

Provide values to any of the below to override the defaults.

To use a pull request use a branch name like pr/N where N is the
pull request number.

Alternatively, SV_BRANCH may also be a link to an
OISF/suricata-verify pull-request.

SV_REPO=
SV_BRANCH=
SU_REPO=
SU_BRANCH=
LIBHTP_REPO=
LIBHTP_BRANCH=

[suricata-qa]

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 19262

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.42729% with 23 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.72%. Comparing base (e41c2f1) to head (d8dc98d).
Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10624      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.69%   82.72%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         926      927       +1     
  Lines      247574   247513      -61     
==========================================
+ Hits       204719   204756      +37     
+ Misses      42855    42757      -98     

Flag	Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus	64.21% <79.41%> (+0.16%)	⬆️
suricata-verify	62.00% <61.27%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
unittests	62.19% <95.63%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[suricata-qa]

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 19332

[suricata-qa]

WARNING:

field	baseline	test	%
	SURI_TLPR1_stats_chk
.tcp.pseudo	2810	19562	696.16%

Pipeline 19629

[catenacyber]

Thanks, looks good overall, some nits though

[jlucovsky]

Continued in #10706