-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Way conflicts are not resolved on upload #827
Comments
|
Thank you @deevroman, @pascal: Could you please provide me my list of changes for the last 30 Minutes form now? Thanks! |
use OSMcha
This means there was a conflict when sending edits. There is a bug in EveryDoor due to which the presence of such errors can lead to empty changesets and even duplicate nodes. There is a way to reproduce this bug, but there is no fix yet. Therefore, now you can only delete these edits. (or export them to fix them in JOSM) |
Hmm. This should not have happened. I look at this code and I think I programmed it backwards: it doesn't actually update node list before uploading a new version of a way. Hopefully it would be an easy fix for the next version. |
Thank you @Zverik! My Question, what should I do now:
|
You can remove individual changes by swiping left. I will test this myself, so you don't need to keep it. Most likely the new version won't be published until late February, so no use keeping those. Although you might want to e.g. export them as osmChange and do the uploading via JOSM, or at least look at tag modifications (tap → tag panel button in the upper right corner) and redo them in josm/id. |
Comparing my ChangeSets and MapChanges using HDYC (How Did You Contribute (Pascal Neis)), I found whenever using EveryDoor, the difference from day to day for ChangeSets is higher than the number of MapChanges. Pascal provided a database extract which shows, that EveryDoor provides a lot of empty changesets, please ref. the attached spreadsheet HDYC EveryDoor.xlsx:
Could someone explain the reason for the empty Changesets. Is there a way to avoid this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: