Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENH]: add in-memory frontend impl #3902

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

codetheweb
Copy link
Contributor

@codetheweb codetheweb commented Mar 4, 2025

Description of changes

Adds an in-memory frontend implementation to be used for testing. Makes the Frontend type an enum to do enum dispatch over.

Test plan

How are these changes tested?

  • Tests pass locally with pytest for python, yarn test for js, cargo test for rust

Added a test for the new frontend impl.

Documentation Changes

Are all docstrings for user-facing APIs updated if required? Do we need to make documentation changes in the docs repository?

n/a

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

  • Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
  • Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
  • Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
  • Are error messages user-friendly?
  • Have all documentation changes needed been made?
  • Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

  • Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
  • Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

  • Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

.map(|(_, v)| v.clone())
.collect::<Vec<_>>();

struct RecordWithDistance(f32, ProjectionRecord);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: maybe use this

pub struct KnnProjectionRecord {

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

KnnProjectionRecord doesn't implement Ord

@codetheweb codetheweb force-pushed the feat-in-memory-frontend branch from a979491 to ae729a3 Compare March 6, 2025 18:26
Copy link
Contributor Author

codetheweb commented Mar 6, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codetheweb codetheweb force-pushed the feat-in-memory-frontend branch 2 times, most recently from 781c521 to 1d59d07 Compare March 6, 2025 18:32
@codetheweb codetheweb requested a review from Sicheng-Pan March 6, 2025 18:33
Comment on lines +24 to +25
tenants: HashSet<String>,
databases: Vec<Database>,
Copy link
Contributor

@Sicheng-Pan Sicheng-Pan Mar 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: HashMap<String, Vec<Database>> that maps tenant to databases might be cleaner

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤷 we usually filter by some combination of the tenant and database names
given that we expect < 1k databases during testing I think this is fine for now
I can optimize later if a flamegraph says it's slow

@codetheweb codetheweb force-pushed the feat-in-memory-frontend branch 4 times, most recently from db72c7c to 23f31bd Compare March 7, 2025 18:29
@codetheweb codetheweb force-pushed the feat-in-memory-frontend branch from 23f31bd to 7b62478 Compare March 7, 2025 23:39
@codetheweb codetheweb force-pushed the feat-in-memory-frontend branch from 7b62478 to c0a6303 Compare March 7, 2025 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants