-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
postgres: use wait_for in disconnect #97
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Note that there is also a timeout for |
This is a good call yup. |
This is recommended by asyncpg [1]. 1: https://github.com/MagicStack/asyncpg/blob/92c2d81256a1efd8cab12c0118d74ccd1c18131b/asyncpg/pool.py#L655-L656
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @blueyed I can take care of finishing this PR if you don't have time right now. WDYT?
@@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ async def connect(self) -> None: | |||
|
|||
async def disconnect(self) -> None: | |||
assert self._pool is not None, "DatabaseBackend is not running" | |||
await self._pool.close() | |||
await asyncio.wait_for(self._pool.close(), timeout=30) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As @tomchristie wrote, it is a good idea to make the timeout configurable, otherwise, 30 seconds can be too much for everybody.
Sure, please go ahead. |
Any progress on this? |
This is recommended by asyncpg [1].
1: https://github.com/MagicStack/asyncpg/blob/92c2d81256a1efd8cab12c0118d74ccd1c18131b/asyncpg/pool.py#L655-L656