-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UIBULKED-605 Enabling Confirm changes button based on forms state #679
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
79deed4
UIBULKED-605 Enabling Confirm changes button
vashjs d5ae7bb
refactor
vashjs b16e1ce
refactor
vashjs d3c5ff2
update CHANGELOG.md
vashjs 702cefa
format imports
vashjs bcb8c78
refactor variables names
vashjs 5f89b4a
Merge branch 'refs/heads/master' into UIBULKED-605
vashjs f03377c
update comment
vashjs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | ||
export const MARC_DEFAULT_BODY = { | ||
bulkOperationMarcRules: [], | ||
totalRecords: 0, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
export const ADMINISTRATIVE_DEFAULT_BODY = { | ||
bulkOperationRules: [], | ||
totalRecords: 0, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
export const MARC_FORM_INITIAL_STATE = [ | ||
{ | ||
tag: '', | ||
ind1: '\\', | ||
ind2: '\\', | ||
subfield: '', | ||
actions: [{ | ||
name: '', | ||
data: [] | ||
}], | ||
parameters: [], | ||
subfields: [], | ||
} | ||
]; | ||
|
||
export const ADMINISTRATIVE_FORM_INITIAL_STATE = [ | ||
{ | ||
option: '', | ||
tenants: [], | ||
actions: [ | ||
{ | ||
initial: undefined, | ||
updated: undefined, | ||
type: undefined, | ||
tenants: [], | ||
updated_tenants: [], | ||
parameters: [] | ||
} | ||
] | ||
} | ||
]; |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you meant to say in the comment that
another one is pristine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm with @BogdanDenis here, but I feel like both the comment AND the conditional contradict the PR description which states "2 valid forms, or 1 valid and one untouched". Here, you instead check 2 valid forms or 1 valid and one NOT pristine. Or do you have the booleans on lines 57 and 58 configured backwards, i.e.
isPristine
should be true when those values are equal, instead of when they differ?Super petty: since your comment describes two different scenarios, just put them on two different lines. As-is, it's hard to parse how the ands and ors separate things.