updating logos

[nate-double-u]

Adding new logos from cncf/artwork#521 (comment)

fixes #1918

[nate-double-u]

I need to update the favicon, just a moment

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for vitess ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	4cfe675
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/vitess/deploys/6786b96eaf17c10008072499
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1919--vitess.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[nate-double-u]

Favicon updated, I think that's everything.

[nate-double-u]

May need to force a refresh to get the favicon to update in the preview

[nate-double-u]

@deepthi, should we use the stacked logo on the splash page?

[nate-double-u]

[nate-double-u]

Stacked may work better if we had a color-icon/white-text version

[deepthi]

Let's not use a stacked logo right now

• You are exactly right that we'd need white text for stacking
• The font doesn't match

I'll open a separate issue for this.

[deepthi]

I don't see anything missing.
Can we drop the background image? It doesn't go well with the new logo.

[nate-double-u]

Unrelated, we should also open an issue to remove all the .DS_Store files and add it to the .gitignore. They're macos system files and shouldn't be in the repo.

[nate-double-u]

Can we drop the background image? It doesn't go well with the new logo.

We can try it -- I'd suggest replacing it with something though, that image helps break the page into sections. Maybe it needs a new color scheme?

[deepthi]

Created #1920 to follow up with more changes

[nate-double-u]

May take me a bit to do the background -- maybe we add the background to the follow up too?

[shlomi-noach]

@nate-double-u if that's OK with you, we can push the one change to change that landing page logo background image.

[hollylawly]

Hey @nate-double-u! Could we just drop the bg and change the hero class to is-dark for now if anything? I personally love how it looks with is-light background though if that's an option.

[shlomi-noach]

Haha, we're all commenting at the same time 😅 . Apologies for the noise @nate-double-u ! Seeing that this PR comes from your own fork we obviously can't push. I'm deferring to whatever you and @hollylawly see fit.

[nate-double-u]

Agreed @hollylawly, good suggestion. I've removed it.

[nate-double-u]

Haha, we're all commenting at the same time 😅 . Apologies for the noise @nate-double-u ! Seeing that this PR comes from your own fork we obviously can't push. I'm deferring to whatever you and @hollylawly see fit.

I feel like i should be streaming 😜 (it's great seeing folks interested! I really like this new logo)

[nate-double-u]

go with is-light background though if that's an option

I went with the is-dark because of how it separates the sections. But I'll let you all come to an agreement -- it's totally feasable, and a quick change, so let me know

[nate-double-u]

Another option, light background with the stacked logo (it's OK that the font is different, it's the logo 🙂)

[shlomi-noach]

Thank you @nate-double-u ! On our side we prefer is-light as it works better for the logo -- though I do see how you mean that the dark background helps dividing the landing page. Let's switch to light for now.

EDIT as I'm writing this you've already deployed that change ❤️

You mentioned your bandwidth is limited for now so we don't want to burden you much further. Our design team will want to spend some time re-evaluating some colors. If that's all right, we'll take a few days to check it out and propose a change. We'll CC you on the PR for review.

Thank you!

[derekperkins]

I like the latest version: light background with the stacked logo the best of all the options. The icon in the logo isn't enough to not have the Vitess name IMO

[nate-double-u]

OK, i'll push the light change with the stacked logo, and I missed removing the back ground from the footer -- I'll do that now too.

[nate-double-u]

I think there are some knock'on effects of changing the footer -- probably best to add it to the #1920 follow up as a part of the re-skin.

[deepthi]

There's a problem with the light background. See how the "Documentation" blends in with no box around it?

[deepthi]

we can merge this without fixing the "Documentation" issue and fix that later. @nate-double-u WDYT? If you agree, please go ahead and push the button. I can add it as a task to #1920

[nate-double-u]

There's a problem with the light background. See how the "Documentation" blends in with no box around it?

Good catch, but i think it's probably better to get this in as is to bring all the logos across the ecosystem back into agreement.

[nate-double-u]

Thanks for all the feedback everyone, I'll merge this as is.

[deepthi]

Thanks a bunch @nate-double-u! I've updated #1920 to reflect the latest gaps with this PR merged.

[hollylawly]

Thank you so much @nate-double-u! Came out great ❤️