-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incorporate additional custom proof options #88
Conversation
…nput and update the procedures accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Editorial. Grammar, etc.
…ovements. Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Set <var>proofConfig</var>.<var>verificationMethod</var> to | ||
<var>options</var>.<var>verificationMethod</var>. | ||
Set |proofConfig|.<var>@context </var>to | ||
|unsecuredDocument|.<var>@context</var>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like it was erroneously copied from the jcs cryptosuite ... am I just misreading it? It looks like it might be in the wrong place because I didn't see it in the jcs cryptosuite in this spec.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is right. Before we can canonize the proofConfig we need to add @context
. Right? This was something that we had to fix way back when I started figuring out how to generate the test vectors...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yes, ok.
Co-authored-by: Dave Longley <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dave Longley <[email protected]>
@Wind4Greg merge conflicts, please fix. @dlongley and @Wind4Greg, I can't tell if we still need to make changes on this PR or not. |
@msporny fixed merge conflicts as best I could. Don't know if I dropped some punctuation updates or not. A lot of small editorial updates have been happening. |
Set <var>proofConfig</var>.<var>verificationMethod</var> to | ||
<var>options</var>.<var>verificationMethod</var>. | ||
Set |proofConfig|.<var>@context </var>to | ||
|unsecuredDocument|.<var>@context</var>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yes, ok.
Normative, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging. |
This PR addresses issue #74. It updates the proof configuration procedures to use a clone of the options input and then updates the procedures accordingly.
Preview | Diff