-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Various updates to ICD 11 prefix record #1352
Conversation
Need help with that error! |
@@ -53913,7 +53916,7 @@ | |||
"name": "Charles Tapley Hoyt", | |||
"orcid": "0000-0003-4423-4370" | |||
}, | |||
"description": "ICD11 codes, which typically appear in health records and can be used for post-coordination", | |||
"description": "An ICD-11 code is a standardized alphanumeric identifier used to classify and document diseases, conditions, and health-related issues for global healthcare and statistical purposes.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you please give some more context?
Who uses ICD11 codes, and where? Why do they exist as a counterpart to ICD11 identifiers, which have URIs and everything, but these don't?
@matentzn I added a comment for follow-up, I think that it would be a missed opportunity not to make the descriptions much more detailed and useful for non-ICD-insiders. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1352 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 42.51% 46.59% +4.08%
==========================================
Files 117 118 +1
Lines 8327 8292 -35
Branches 1963 1363 -600
==========================================
+ Hits 3540 3864 +324
+ Misses 4582 4241 -341
+ Partials 205 187 -18 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I want to say that this is a compromise I can just tolerate, but I don't really like it. The choice of having
icd11
,ICD-11
andICD11
be associated with the foundation component strikes me as questionable (but I also don't know for sure if this is wrong, else I would insist). What I really do not like is to haveicd11
being the default prefix for the icd11 foundation, rather than the much less ambiguousicd11.foundation
.I would say, lets not do any more damage now, this PR will satisfy our immediate needs, but IMO we should just have the icd11 team itself decide what they want. I know them all quite well, and will reach out now to see what they say.