Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various updates to ICD 11 prefix record #1352

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

I want to say that this is a compromise I can just tolerate, but I don't really like it. The choice of having icd11, ICD-11 and ICD11 be associated with the foundation component strikes me as questionable (but I also don't know for sure if this is wrong, else I would insist). What I really do not like is to have icd11 being the default prefix for the icd11 foundation, rather than the much less ambiguous icd11.foundation.

I would say, lets not do any more damage now, this PR will satisfy our immediate needs, but IMO we should just have the icd11 team itself decide what they want. I know them all quite well, and will reach out now to see what they say.

@matentzn matentzn changed the title Various updated to ICD 11 prefix record Various updates to ICD 11 prefix record Jan 11, 2025
@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Need help with that error!

@@ -53913,7 +53916,7 @@
"name": "Charles Tapley Hoyt",
"orcid": "0000-0003-4423-4370"
},
"description": "ICD11 codes, which typically appear in health records and can be used for post-coordination",
"description": "An ICD-11 code is a standardized alphanumeric identifier used to classify and document diseases, conditions, and health-related issues for global healthcare and statistical purposes.",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you please give some more context?

Who uses ICD11 codes, and where? Why do they exist as a counterpart to ICD11 identifiers, which have URIs and everything, but these don't?

@cthoyt
Copy link
Member

cthoyt commented Jan 11, 2025

@matentzn I added a comment for follow-up, I think that it would be a missed opportunity not to make the descriptions much more detailed and useful for non-ICD-insiders.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.59%. Comparing base (8950e70) to head (ab32d40).
Report is 246 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1352      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.51%   46.59%   +4.08%     
==========================================
  Files         117      118       +1     
  Lines        8327     8292      -35     
  Branches     1963     1363     -600     
==========================================
+ Hits         3540     3864     +324     
+ Misses       4582     4241     -341     
+ Partials      205      187      -18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cthoyt cthoyt merged commit abe024c into biopragmatics:main Jan 11, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants