Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge the branch "rjn-merge2" into development #1

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Mar 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bruhwiler
Copy link
Member

We must move to the most recent version of WarpX, so that we can implement fixes to the parser that are expected to be in place soon, courtesy of the WarpX development team.

@bruhwiler bruhwiler requested review from robnagler and ncook882 March 7, 2025 21:15
@bruhwiler
Copy link
Member Author

I've resolved the only conflict, which was just a print statement.

@ncook882
Copy link
Member

ncook882 commented Mar 9, 2025

I've been able to pull this version, build it on RadiaSoft servers, and successfully run and analyze an example runscript.

@ncook882
Copy link
Member

@bruhwiler and I confirmed consistent physics results across example runs.

@ncook882 ncook882 merged commit 0290a6b into development Mar 10, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants